Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
16 May 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
17 May 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Sham Kakar |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
17 May 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
7 Jun 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Hein te Riele |
4 Jul 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Chris McCabe |
16 Jul 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ningzhi Xu |
1 Sep 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Sham Kakar |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
1 Sep 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
1 Sep 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Sham Kakar |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
1 Sep 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
4 Sep 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Chris McCabe |
27 Sep 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Hein te Riele |
15 Oct 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Sham Kakar |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
15 Oct 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Publishing | ||
8 Nov 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
20 Nov 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2407-12-532 |
You can find further information about peer review here.