Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
24 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
24 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Jose Sanz-Santos |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
24 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
2 Aug 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Takahiro Nakajima |
2 Sep 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Marco Patelli |
13 Sep 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Jose Sanz-Santos |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
13 Sep 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
28 Sep 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Takahiro Nakajima |
25 Oct 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Jose Sanz-Santos |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
25 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
9 Nov 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Takahiro Nakajima |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
27 Dec 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Jose Sanz-Santos |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
27 Dec 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Publishing | ||
21 Jan 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
21 Jan 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2407-12-34 |
You can find further information about peer review here.