Skip to main content

Table 5 Site-specific efficacy of ceCT and 18F-FDG PET/CT

From: Diagnostic performance of contrast enhanced CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT in suspicious recurrence of biliary tract cancer after curative resection

Site

 

ceCT

PET/CT

Combination of ceCT and PET/CT

p -value

     

ceCT vs PET/CT

ceCT vs Combination

 

Sensitivity*

88% (14/16)

88% (14/16)

100% (16/16)

0.10

0.5

Locoregional area (n = 16)

Specificity*

86% (37/43)

93% (40/43)

84% (36/43)

0.38

1.0

 

PPV

70% (14/20)

82% (14/17)

70% (16/23)

0.46

1.0

 

NPV

95% (37/39)

93% (40/42)

100% (36/36)

1.0

0.49

 

Sensitivity*

63% (10/16)

94% (15/16)

94% (15/16)

0.08

0.08

Lymph node (n = 16)

Specificity*

93% (40/43)

95% (41/43)

91% (39/43)

0.91

0.74

 

PPV

77% (10/13)

88% (15/17)

79% (15/19)

0.63

0.61

 

NPV

87% (40/46)

98% (41/43)

98% (39/40)

0.11

0.12

  1. * p-value was calculated by McNemar's test
  2. PPV = positive predictive value; NPV = negative predictive value