Skip to main content

Table 2 Univariate analysis of individual psychosocial factors of index patients' siblings and their association with participation in colonoscopic screening.

From: Determinants of participation in colonoscopic screening by siblings of colorectal cancer patients in France

 

Total

Participators

Non-participators

P

 

(n = 172)

(n = 114)

(n = 58)

 

Health Belief Model

   Perceived CRC vulnerability score (1 to 5)

3.5 (1.2)

3.7 (1.2)

3.1 (1.1)

0.0026

   Perceived CRC severity score (2 to 10)

7.7 (2.0)

7.8 (1.9)

7.5 (2.3)

0.27

   Perceived screening benefits score (6 to 30)

25.6 (4.4)

26.6 (3.6)

23.6 (5.2)

0.0004

   Perceived screening barriers score (6 to 30)

14.5 (6.0)

12.9 (5.6)

17.6 (5.6)

< 10-4

   Score for motivation to safeguard health (7 to 35)

28.0 (4.6)

28.6 (4.4)

26.9 (4.8)

0.025

Fatalism score (4 to 20)

11.1 (4.9)

10.6 (4.8)

12.1 (4.8)

0.058

Theory of Reasoned Action

   Attitude score (perceived usefulness of screening) (1 to 5)

4.2 (1.2)

4.4 (1.2)

3.9 (1.1)

0.024

   Subjective norms(perceived social pressure to perform screening)

134 (88.7)

100 (98.0)

34 (69.4)

< 10-4

   Other preventive or screening behaviours

158 (91.9)

105 (92.1)

53 (91.4)

1.0

Smoking status

   

0.038

   Non-smoker

109 (65.7)

79 (72.5)

30 (52.6)

 

   Ex-smoker

36 (21.7)

19 (17.4)

17 (29.8)

 

   Smoker

21 (12.6)

11 (10.1)

10 (17.5)

 
  1. Quantitative variables: mean, (standard deviation). Qualitative variables: number (percentage)
  2. Missing data: Perceived vulnerability score (4), perceived severity score (3), perceived benefits score (8), perceived barriers score (6), motivation score (6), fatalism score (4), attitude score (10), subjective norms (21), smoking status (6).