miR-2682-3p antagonizes its host lncRNA-MIR137HG by interacting with the same target FUS to regulate the progression of gastric cancer

Background The mechanism of long non-coding RNA MIR137HG in human gastric cancer (GC) is currently unknown. In the present study, we aimed to explore the function and mechanism of MIR137HG in gastric cancer. Methods The expression of lncRNA-MIR137HG in 69 gastric cancer samples and their paired surgical margin (SM) tissue samples were tested by QRT-PCR. UCSC was used to find the gene location relationship among MIR137HG and its embedded miRNAs. TargetScan was used to predict the targets of miR-2682-3p. Starbase was used to predict the candidate proteins that interacted with MIR137HG. Western blot, co-focus, and RIP assay were used to verify the direct interaction between MIR137HG and FUS (fused in sarcoma/translocated in liposarcoma, FUS/TLS), while dual-luciferase reporter assay was used to confirm the interaction between miR-2682-3p and FUS. Cell migration assays, colony formation, and xenografts assay were used to investigate the function of MIR137HG and miR-2682-3p to tumor growth and metastasis. Western blot assay was used to explore the downstream candidate protein of FUS. Results Data showed that MIR137HG expressed significantly higher in GC than in SM. MIR137HG promoted colony formation and migration in vitro and promoted tumor formation and metastasis in vivo. MIR137HG is distributed in both the nucleus and cytoplasm. It was co-located with FUS and could directly interact with FUS, which might interact with other proteins, such as MET(MET-proto-oncogene, receptor tyrosine kinase), RHOC(ras homolog family member), and CTNNB1(catenin beta1). These proteins may involve different signaling pathways to regulate gastric cancer progression. By contrast, the embedded miR-2682-3p could antagonize the series functions of its host lncRNA-MIR137HG by targeting FUS. Conclusions lncRNA-MIR137HG promoted growth and metastasis in gastric cancer by interacting with FUS, while miR-2682-3p could inhibit the function of MIR137HG via the same target FUS. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-09740-9.

Japan, and Korea [3,4]. In the last few decades, significant progress has been made in GC treatment, and many attempts have been made to find effective treatment strategies. However, the morbidity and mortality of GC remain at a high level. Therefore, gaining insight into the underlying mechanisms of GC progression will help find the novel diagnosis and treatment for GC.
Non-coding RNAs play essential roles in keeping cells in their state, and their abnormal expression might lead to various diseases, including cancer. Among them, long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), which are more than 200 nucleotides in length, have been identified different vital functions, such as participating in the autophagy pathway [5,6], controlling cell differentiation [7], and acting as competing endogenous RNAs (ceRNAs) of miRNAs [5,8]. In addition, sometimes lncRNA can be the host gene of miRNAs [9] which makes a more interesting relationship between them. For example, MIR100HG, the host gene of miR-125b, was inhibited by GATA6, but this repression will be relieved by miR-125b by targeting GATA6 [10].
MIR137HG, the host gene of miR-137 and miR-2682, is a long non-coding RNA. It was primarily reported in neural system diseases. For example, it was reported that polymorphism of MIR137HG rs1625579 was related to schizophrenia [11,12]. Besides, researchers have found that MIR137HG could also influence human cancer. According to the TCGA database analysis, Liu and colleagues found that MIR137HG could play as ceRNA in Laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) [13] and muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) [14]. However, to date, the function of MIR137HG and its relationship with embedded miRNAs in gastric cancer has not been investigated.
miRNA is another kind of small non-coding RNA. They can regulate the coding gene expression at the transcriptional level and interact with long non-coding RNAs. The gene of miR-2682 is located in the second intron of MIR137HG, which has been reported in some cancers. For example, it has been reported that miR-2682-3p could inhibit osteosarcoma cell proliferation by targeting CCND2 (Cyclin D2), MMP8 (Matrix metallopeptidase 8), and Myd88 (Myeloid differentiation primary response gene 88) [15]. miR-2682-5p can inhibit HOXB8 (Homeobox B8) from promoting the function of LNC01006 [16]. miR-2682-5p could also form a feedback cycle with ETS transcription factor ELK1 (ELK1)/lncRNA-SNHG7 to enhance bladder cancer cell growth [17]. However, the function of miR-2682 has not been reported in gastric cancer. Therefore, it became the second target in our present study.
Fused in Sarcoma/Translocated in Sarcoma (FUS) is a critical nucleus RNA-binding protein. It can shuttle back and forth between the nucleus and cytoplasm. It has been reported as an essential gene in neural system diseases, such as Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). For example, cytoplasmic FUS aggregates are a pathological hallmark in a subset of patients with ALS [18]. FUS has also been reported in cancer. circ0005276 interacted with FUS to activate the transcription of its host gene XIAP (X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein) to regulate the process of prostate cancer [19]. Dian Xiong and colleagues indicated that elevated FUS/TLS expression is negatively associated with E-cadherin expression and prognosis of patients with non-small cell lung cancer [20]. Qiong Wu et al. reported that DLX6-AS1 promotes cell proliferation, migration, and EMT of gastric cancer through FUSregulated MAP4K1 [21]. Hong Zhu et al. have reported that XIST(X inactive specific transcript) served as a ceRNA in cervical cancer progression through modulating miR-200a/Fus axis [22]. However, FUS plays as the same target by both lncRNA and its embed miRNA have not been reported. Therefore, it became the third target in our present study.
The present study found that MIR137HG was overexpressed in gastric cancer (GC) samples than surgical margin (SM) samples. It could promote the abilities of migration, invasion, and colony formation in gastric cancer cell lines. At the same time, the expression of miR-2682-3p was negatively related to the expression of MIR137HG and could inhibit the migration and colony formation in gastric cell line caused by MIR137HG. The animal model confirmed the negative relationship between MIR137HG and miR-2682-3p. FUS was the exact target of both MIR137HG and miR-2682-3p, which can interact with series proteins, including CTNNB1, RHOC, MET. In conclusion, MIR137HG, miR-2682-3p, and FUS formed a negative feedback loop to regulate gastric cancer progression.

Sample collection and cell lines culture
Sixty-nine GC samples and their paired surgical margin samples were collected from the Affiliated Lihui Li Hospital of Ningbo University between 2016-2017. Samples were stored at liquid nitrogen (-196℃). All individuals provided informed written consents for using their tissues in this experimental study, and the Ethics Committee of Ningbo University approved this study.
The cell line BGC823 was obtained from Beijing Cancer Hospital. HGC27 was obtained from the Medical School of Ningbo University. Both BGC823 and HGC27 were tested by STR authentication (GENEWIZ, China).

Quantitative real-time PCR
According to the manufacturer's protocol, the total RNA of tissue samples and gastric cancer cell lines was extracted by Trizol reagent (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, USA). cDNA was synthesized by HiFiScript cDNA synthesis Kit (CW2569, CWBIO. China). RNA polymerase (M0276S, NEB, USA) and RT-adaptor were needed for miRNA-specific reverse transcription. The sequences of primers were as follows:

Construction of control lentivirus and MIR137HG lentivirus cell strain in GC cell lines
MIR137HG was synthesized and cloned onto pcDNA 3.1b vector by Sangon Biotech Inc. It was then packaged as MIR137HG lentivirus and negative control lentivirus by HANBI Inc. Lentivirus was infected into BGC823 and HGC27 cell lines for 48 h and set up stable strains by puromycin (0.25 μg/ml).
The targeted proteins were then analyzed by LI-COR model 3600(LI-COR, USA).

Cell migration assays (transwell assay and scratch assay)
About 4 × 10 4 cells were seeded within 200 μl RPMI1640 onto the upper layer of the chamber. The lower layers were added about 500 μl mixed cultures with 90% RPMI 1640 and 10% FBS. 24 h later, cells were fixed by 2% formaldehyde for 20 min, followed by washing twice by 1 × PBS, and then stained with 1% crystal for 30 min. Cells in the upper well were removed with cotton swabs, and cells on the opposite membranes of the chamber were counted by the microscope system. Each chamber was counted in six fields. BD Matrigel (356234, USA) was diluted by RPMI1640 (1:8) and was seed 80 μl per hole for the invasion assay.
Cells were plated to 70% confluence on 6 well plates and were wounded with 200ul pipette tips. The wound healing status of each group was observed and photographed after scratching 0 and 18 h.

Dual-Luciferase reporter assay
The 3'-UTR segments of the WT and MUT FUS gene were amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and inserted into PmiR-PB-ReportTM. Co-transfections of WT-FUS-3'-UTR or MUT-FUS-3'-UTR plasmids with miR-2682-3p mimic into the cells were accomplished by using Lipo6000TM. Luciferase activity was measured after 48 h transfection by the Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System (E2920, Promega, USA). All assays were performed in triplicated, and each experiment was repeated three times.

Animal models
The experiments were reviewed and approved by the Laboratory Animal Ethical Committee at Ningbo University. Five-week-old female Balb/C nude mice (n = 18) were purchased from SLAC.cn (Shanghai, China), and maintained in a specific pathogen-free environment. For tumor formation assay, 1 × 10 7 GC cells were subcutaneously implanted in nude mice. After 15 days, mice were sacrificed, and tumors were removed for examination. We first injected 1 × 10 7 GC cells for 7 days for the tumor inhibition assay to form a subcutaneous MIR137HG tumor model and injected the Ago-miR-2682-3p (1 nmol/ time) every 3 days into the tumor model and tested the volume. After 14 days, mice were sacrificed, and tumors were removed for examination. For the metastasis assay, 1 × 10 7 GC cells were injected into the tails caudal of nude mice. After 42 days, mice were sacrificed, and their lungs were removed for examination.

RNA immunoprecipitation
The binding of MIR137HG with FUS and DGCR8 was confirmed through the RIP kit according to its manufacturer's protocol (Millipore/17-701/EZ-Magna RIPTM RNA-Binding Protein Immunoprecipitation Kit, Millipore Corporation, Billerica, MA01821, USA). The enrichment of MIR137HG was assessed via real-time quantitative PCR.

IP and LC-MS/MS
About 2 × 10 7 BGC823 MIR137HG cell strain was washed with pre-chilled phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and lysed by RIPA (R0010-20, Solarbio, China). Cell lysates were scratched and centrifuged at 14000 g for 15 min at 4℃ to separate the supernatant. The supernatant was incubated with 100 μl protein A/G beads for 10 min at 4℃ and centrifuged 14000 g for 15 min at 4℃ to get the supernatant. The supernatant was tested the protein concentration by BCA Kit (C503021, Sangon Biotech, China). Protein was diluted by 1×PBS to 2 μg/ ul, and separately incubated with rabbit anti-FUS (5 μg, Ab70381,Abcam, UK) and rabbit anti-IgG (PP64B, Millipore, USA) antibody overnight at 4℃. Subsequently, 100ul protein A/G was incubated with the complex overnight at 4℃. Collecting the complex and performed the SDS-PAGE and stained by Coomassie Blue Staining Solution (P1305-1, Solarbio, China). Protein strip around 75KD (location of FUS) was then sent to Sangon Biotech for LC-MS/MS analysis.

Statistical analysis
All statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS 18.0 statistical software. An intergroup comparison was carried out using Mann-Whitney U-test or the Students' t-test according to data type. A receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve was generated using the expression level of MIR137HG to separate GC patients with poor differentiation from GC patients with moderate/ well differentiation. Differences with a P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

MIR137HG levels were increased in gastric cancer
69 gastric cancer (GC) tissue samples and their paired surgical margin (SM) tissue samples were tested by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (QRT-PCR). Data showed that the expression of MIR137HG was upregulated in GC samples compared with SM samples (Fig. 1A, Student' t-test, GC VS SM, P = 0.037). Further analysis showed that MIR137HG expressed higher in patients with low tissue differentiation than in patients with moderate/high tissue differentiation in the SM group. (Fig. 1B and Table 1, Mann-Whitney U -test, Poor VS Moderate/High, P = 0.003). MIR137HG was increased in male patients compared with female patients in the GC group ( Fig. 1C and Table 1, Mann-Whitney U-test, Male VS Female, P = 0.039). The discrimination of GC patients with poor differentiation from GC patients with moderate/well differentiation by using MIR137HG expression in SM samples was demonstrated by the ROC curve with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.667 (Fig. 1D, Cut off value = 0.07, P = 0.042).

MIR137HG promote cell colony formation and cell migration in gastric cancer cell lines
To investigate the function of MIR137HG in gastric cancer, we infected MIR137HG over-expression lentivirus in BGC823 and HGC27 ( Fig. 2A (a,b,c), P = 0.001 and Fig. 2B (a,b,c), P = 0.002). Colony formation assay showed that BGC823 MIR137HG could significantly promote colony formation compared to controls ( Fig. 2C (a,b,c), P = 0.005). HGC27 MIR137HG could also boost the colony formation compared with its control, but not significantly ( Fig. 2D (a,b,c), P = 0.084). Cell migration ability was separately tested by transwell assay and scratch assay. Data showed that both BGC823 MIR137HG and HGC27 MIR137HG could boost the cell migration ability compared with their controls (Fig. 3A (a,b,c) and B (a,b,c), Transwell assay, P < 0.001 in BGC823, P = 0.005 in HGC27; Fig. 3C(a,b,c) and D(a,b,c), Scratch assay, P < 0.001 in BGC823, P = 0.020 in HGC27).

The embedded miR-2682-3p could antagonize the function of MIR137HG in vitro and in vivo
According to the UCSC database, miR-137 and miR-2682 are separately located in the third exon and the second intron of the MIR137HG gene (Fig. 4A). So we were interested in their expression relationship. We found that the expression of miR-137 was positively related with MIR137HG ( Fig. 4Ba, P = 0.001 and Fig. 4Bb, P = 0.004), while the expression of miR-2682-3p was negatively associated with MIR137HG expression (Fig. 4Ba, P = 0.001 and Fig. 4Bc, P = 0.001).
We separately hypodermic injected Ctrl and MIR137HG cell strain into Balb/C Nude mice. 15 days later, we found that the MIR137HG over-expression group could promote tumor growth compared with the Ctrl group ( Fig. 6A and B, Weight, Ctrl vs MIR137HG, P = 0.001). IHC data showed that Ki67 and FUS were expressed in the MIR137HG cell strain higher than in the Ctrl cell strain (Fig. 6C). To analyze whether miR-2682-3p could insist the function of MIR137HG, we further injected MIR137HG over-expression BGC823 cell strain into Balb/C nude mice to form the subcutaneously implanted tumor model. We then injected the Ago-miR-2682-3p into the tumor every two days. The results showed that miR-2682-3p could significantly disturb the tumor formation compared with the NC group ( Fig. 6D and E, Weight, Ago-miR-NC vs Ago-miR-2682-3p, P = 0.035). In addition, the growth rates of tumor volume after injection were slowed down by miR-2682-3p (Fig. 6F). These results indicated that miR-2682-3p could inhibit the function of MIR137HG in tumor formation. The tail injection of Balb/C nude mice showed that MIR137HG could promote lung metastasis compared with the Ctrl group. (Fig. 6G, lung metastasis: MIR137HG VS Ctrl, 2/3 VS 1/3).

FUS was the exact target of MIR137HG and miR-2682-3p
To further explore the mechanism of MIR137HG, we separately observed the subcellular location of MIR137HG in BGC823 and HGC27. Data showed that MIR137HG was sub-localized in both the nucleus and cytoplasm (Fig. 7A and B).
TargetScan database showed that FUS might be the candidate target of miR-2682-3p (Fig. 7F). Western blot Fig. 5 The function of miR-2682-3p and MIR137HG on the migration ability of BGC823. A and B The scratch assay indicated that miR-2682-3p mimic could inhibit the migration ability of BGC823 MIR137HG (P = 0.066), while miR-2682-3p inhibitor could promote the migration ability BGC823 Ctrl (P = 0.032). C and D The transwell assay indicated miR-2682-3p mimic could inhibit the migration ability of BGC823 MIR137HG (P = 0.002), while miR-2682-3p inhibitor could promote the migration ability of BGC823 Ctrl (P = 0.015) assay indicated that FUS expression could be decreased by miR-2682-3p mimic, while it could be increased by a miR-2682-3p inhibitor (Fig. 7H). The data of the dualluciferase reporter assay confirmed that FUS interacted with miR-2682-3p (Fig. 7I). We also tested the downstream differentiation of protein expression between BGC823 Ctrl and BGC823 MIR137HG by IP target FUS following LC-MS/MS (Supplement datasets file). And we selected several proteins related to tumor growth and metastasis to analyze further. String data showed that they might have more contact with each other (Fig. 7G).

Discussion
Gastric cancer is a severe threat to human health. However, the mechanisms were still complicated and have not been revealed. Recently, ncRNAs have been proven to play a critical role in various cancers. Our study illustrated long non-coding RNA MIR137HG could promote the progression of gastric cancer through interacting with FUS and affecting a series of its downstream molecules (MET, RHOC, and CTNNB1. et al.) which might regulate the cell survival, proliferation, migration, and invasion. On the contrary, its embedded miR-2682-3p could disturb the function of MIR137HG to gastric cancer by holding the same target FUS.
We firstly focused on MIR137HG because of miR-137, which we tested and reported as a tumor suppresser molecule in gastric cancer [25,26]. As miR-137 is located in the third exon of MIR137HG, we firstly supposed that MIR137HG simply played as the primary molecule of miR-137. However, the results showed that the expression of MIR137HG was higher in GC samples than in SM samples and was not related to the expression of miR-137 in gastric cancer (data not shown). Genecard database indicated that MIR137HG might have 6 kinds of transcripts, which have been numbered as 201-206. It meant that MIR137HG was not the only form of pri-miR-137. That would lead to the non-correlative between their expression level in the tissue. However, the expression coincidence between MIR137HG and miR-137 could be tested in the gastric cell line. That might be related to the gene expression in the cell line. Furthermore, we found another embedded miR-2682 in the second intron of MIR137HG. And the expression of miR-2682-3p was negatively related to MIR137HG, which aroused our interest in their functions and mechanisms.
According to the clinical analysis, MIR137HG was more expressed in male patients than female patients. If it played an oncogene role in GC, it might be one of the reasons for a relatively higher occurrence of GC in males than in females-about 2 ~ 2.5 times in males than in females [4]. More interestingly, MIR137HG was more expressed in the poor differentiation group than in SM's middle/well differentiation group. We could get some clues from this data: 1. patients with higher MIR137HG expression intending to lead to the poor differentiation tumor. We found a cut-off value that could discriminate the GC patients with poor differentiation from those with moderate/well differentiation. Although it didn't have a high diagnostic value limit by the present research condition, it meant that we could use the expression of MIR137HG in SM samples from GC patients to predict the malignancy of GC, which may make sense to the therapy of different GC patients. 2. MIR137HG might influence the survival prognosis of GC patients. Unfortunately, we didn't further track the survival data and could not give a definite answer, which we should avoid and overcome subsequent studies. 3. The significant difference among differentiation in SM indicated that the tumor microenvironment might be related to the function of MIR137HG. The significance of MIR137HG in SM samples of GC patients shift our focus from the tumor itself to the tumor microenvironment. Therefore, we predict that the function of MIR137HG may be involved in the tumor microenvironment. However, the hypothesis still needs to be confirmed by future assays.
According to the results in vivo, MIR137HG could promote gastric cancer cell colony formation, migration, and invasion (Supplement Fig. 1) in the gastric cancer cell lines. Meanwhile, animal models supported the results of cell line assays. MIR137HG can promote tumor formation and lung metastasis. The function results in vivo and in vitro were coincident with expression data, which indicated that MIR137HG played an oncogene in gastric cancer. Some reports indicated that MIR137HG might be related to cancer. For example, Wang et al. reported that the MIR137HG gene polymorphisms were implicated in liver cancer susceptibility among the Chinese Li population [27]. However, few reports were related to the function of MIR137HG in human tumors, which was the significance of our present research.
The subcellular location of molecules determines their functions and mechanisms in cellular. RNA-FISH assay showed that MIR137HG is located both in the nucleus and cytoplasm. That means that it could (See figure on next page.) Fig. 7 The subcellular location of MIR137HG and the interaction among molecules. A The subcellular location of MIR137HG BGC823; B The subcellular location of MIR137HG HGC27 ( DAPI was used to stain the nucleus; Cy3 separately labeled MIR137HG, U6, and 18S; U6 was the control of nucleus sub-location; 18S was the control of cytoplasm); C Starbase V2.0 indicated that FUS was a candidate target of MIR137HG; D RIP assay showed that FUS could directly interact with MIR137HG; E Con-focus data showed that MIR137HG and FUS could sub-locate in the same region of the cell; F TargetScan predicted that miR-2682-3p could target with FUS; G The String database predicted the relationships among FUS and its candidated targets tested by IP followed LC-MS/MS; H Western blot data showed that miR-2682-3p mimic could inhibit the expression of FUS in BGC823 MIR137HG, while miR-2682-3p inhibitor could promote the expression of FUS in BGC823 Ctrl; I Dual-luciferase assay showed that miR-2683-3p could bind data showed that MET  interact with molecules in the nucleus and cytoplasm. Biological information analysis indicated that MIR137HG could interact with DGCR8 and FUS. DGCR8 is the critical molecular of miRNA maturation [28]. Therefore, it was reasonable that DGCR8 could interact with MIR137HG and be involved in the maturation process of miR-2682 and miR-137. And RIP assay confirmed this prediction (Supplement Fig. 2). FUS is an essential RNA binding protein, which has been reported in nervous system diseases and human tumors. As mentioned earlier, Fent et al. have reported that FUS can activate XIAP and promote the proliferation and migration of prostate cancer by interacting with circ005267 [19]. Therefore, it indicated that FUS might play as an oncogene in human tumors. Our data showed that FUS and MIR137HG could distribute in the same area of cellular, which indicated their possible interaction. And RIP data have confirmed their direct interaction with each other. Suppose the oncogene role of MIR137HG and its interactive protein FUS, and we tried to explore their downstream molecules. We performed an IP assay and compared the protein expression differences between BGC823 Ctrl and BGC823 MIR137HG. LC/ MS provided about 116 proteins with significant differences between them. Among them, we selected several proteins related to the progression of cancer. And data of Western blot have confirmed that RHOC, MET, CTNNB1, and FUS expressed coincident with MIR137HG. According to the current acknowledgment, MET might regulate GC cell survival and proliferation by the Wnt signaling pathway. In contrast, RHOC might regulate the GC cell metastasis by the mTOR signaling pathway. However, a series of assays should be verified in the following assays.
According to the negative relationship between miR-2682-3p and MIR137HG, they might have opposite functions. Data showed that miR-2682-3p played a tumor suppressor function in GC cancer in vivo and in vitro, which confirmed the negative relationship between miR-2682-3p and MIR137HG. Some reports were also consistent with our conclusion. For example, miR-2682-3p has been reported as a tumor suppressor gene in osteosarcoma [15]. Moreover, FUS could not only interact with MIR137HG but also was predicted by TargetScan as a candidate target of miR-2682-3p. Data of western blot assay showed that miR-2682-3p mimic could decrease the protein level of FUS, while miR-2682-3p inhibitor could increase the protein level of FUS. And Dual-luciferase reporter assay has confirmed such a prediction.

Conclusions
In summary, our data indicated the following conclusions: 1) MIR137HG can be spliced by DGCR8 and then produced miR-137 and miR-2682; 2) FUS can interact with MIR137HG and can shuttle back and forth between nucleus and cytoplasm to influence a series of proteins (MET, RHOC, CTNNB1. et al.) and finally promote GC progression; 3) miR-2682-3p can play as an antagonistic role to inhibit the progression by inhibiting the exact target of MIR137HG, FUS (Fig. 8).