Skip to main content

Table 9 Univariate and multivariate analyses model analyzed predictors of successful conversion in 809 patients.

From: Real-world practice of conversion surgery for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma - a single center data of 26 consecutive patients

Variables

Univariate analysis

Multivariate analysis

HR (95%CI)

P value

HR (95%CI)

P value

Age (years, < 65 vs ≥65)

0.629(0.213~1.86)

0.402

  

Sex (female vs male)

0.95(0.281~3.212)

0.935

  

ECOG PS (0~2 vs 3~4)

0.049(0.022~1.229)

0.769

  

BCLC staging (A~B vs C~D)

1.134(0.435~2.953)

0.797

  

Child-Pugh classification (A~B vs C)

0.384(0.051~2.883)

0.838

  

Number of tumors (solitary vs multiple)

0.391(0.166~0.921)

0.032

0.738(0.278~1.956)

0.541

Tumor size (cm, ≤10 vs >10)

3.077(1.296~7.302)

0.011

2.484(0.892~6.92)

0.082

AFP(ng/ml,≤400 vs >400)

2.122(0.796~5.653)

0.133

2.099(0.766~5.751)

0.15

HBV (no vs yes)

0.451(0.16~1.268)

0.131

0.63(0.218~1.815)

0.63

ALT (u/L,≤40 vs >40)

0.704(0.264~1.876)

0.483

  

AST(u/L, ≤35 vs >35)

2.375(0.687~8.204)

0.172

2.132(0.575~7.905)

0.257

Bilirubin(umol/L, ≤35 vs >35)

0.042(0~29.086)

0.342

  

Albumin (g/L, ≤35 vs >35)

0.94(0.272~3.248)

0.922

  

Liver cirrhosis (no vs yes)

0.165(0.06~0.454)

<0.001

0.291(0.098~0.869)

0.027

PVTT (no vs yes)

1.18(0.489~2.85)

0.713

  

HVTT (no vs yes)

2.501(0.58~10.782)

0.219

  

IVCTT (no vs yes)

0.045(0~93.26)

0.425

  

Ascites (no vs yes)

0.229(0.053~0.987)

0.048

0.259(0.056~1.206)

0.085

Intrahepatic metastasis (no vs yes)

0.301(0.04~2.25)

0.242

  

Extrahepatic metastasis (no vs yes)

0.148(0.054~0.993)

0.063

0.181(0.024~1.378)

0.099

lymphatic metastasis (no vs yes)

0.672(0.252~2.012)

0.478

  

Treatment (LR+TKI/anti-PD-1 vs LR+TKI+anti-PD-1)

1.71(0.584~5.002)

0.328

  
  1. The association between successful conversion and those baseline stratification tactors, including age, sex, ECOG, BCLC staging, Child-Pugh classification, number of tumors, tumor size, serum AFP level, HBV infection, ALT, AST, bilirubin, albumin, liver cirrhosis, PVTT, HVTT, IVCTT, ascites, Intrahepatic metastasis, lymphatic metastasis, extrahepatic metastases and treatment methods, respectively, was analyzed by Cox proportional-hazards model to generate crude HRs and 95% Cls. Variables with P < 0.2 in univariate analysis were included in multivariate regression analysis model. P < 0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant
  2. BCLC Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer Staging System, PVTT Portal vein tumor thrombus, HVTT Hepatic vein tumor thrombus, IVCTT Inferior vena cava tumor thrombus, LR Loco-regional therapy