Skip to main content

Table 1 Criteria used to elevate the quality of included studies in this meta-analysis of six most reported biomarkers (derived from REMARK)

From: The prognostic value of separate lymphatic invasion and vascular invasion in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis and systematic review

Checklist

Criteria

1-Samples

Cohort study with a well-defined study population. Medical treatment for patients was reasonable. Authors provided justification for excluded patients

2- Clinical parameters of the cohort

The clinical parameters such as age, gender, surgical procedure, pathologic stage and histological type was provided

3-Staining Method

Clear staining method such as H&E and IHC was referred to original paper

4-Prognosis

The survival endpoints were defined as overall survival and disease-free survival

5- Statistics

Statistical analysis was univariate or multivariate Cox proportional hazards method

6- Effect size

HR or RR with 95% CI and P-vales were provided

  1. Abbreviations: H&E Haematoxylin–eosin, IHC Immunohistochemistry, CI Confidence interval, RR Relative risk, HR Hazard risk