Skip to main content

Table 6 The cox analysis of DFS

From: Optimization of a laparoscopic procedure for advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma based on the concept of “waiting time”: a preliminary report

 

Univariate for DFS

Multivariate for DFS

Univariate for OS

Univariate for S

OR(95%CI)

p

OR(95%CI)

p

OR(95%CI)

p

OR(95%CI)

p

Age, ≥ 60y

0.957(0.623–1.471)

0.841

  

0.932(0.575–1.512)

0.932

  

Sex, male

0.897(0.587–1.370)

0.614

  

1.001(0.637–1.574)

0.996

  

Tumor location, right side

0.735(0.467–1.156)

0.183

  

0.708(0.435–1.151)

0.163

  

Tumor number, multiple

0.782(0.308–1.987)

0.606

  

0.589(0.191–1.814)

0.357

  

Three-step process optimization

0.640(0.403–1.017)

0.059

0.627(0.407–0.967)

0.035

0.640(0.398–1.031)

0.066

0.652(0.408–1.043)

0.074

T stage

 

0.879

   

0.845

  

 T1A

Ref

   

Ref

   

 T1B

1.198(0.697–2.060)

0.514

  

1.169(0.670–2.041)

0.582

  

 T2

1.242(0.701–2.203)

0.458

  

1.119(0.593–2.111)

0.729

  

 T3

1.307(0.501–2.144)

0.922

  

0.947(0.427–2.100)

0.893

  

 T4

1.720(0.481–6.146)

0.404

  

1.932(0.555–6.724)

0.301

  

Margin, R1

0.535(0.154–1.855)

0.324

  

3.059(0.868–10.779)

0.082

2.250(0.690–7.341)

0.179

Tumor differentiation

 

0.059

   

0.012

 

0.014

 Well

Ref

 

Ref

 

Ref

 

Ref

 

 Moderate

0.870(0.533–1.418)

0.575

0.915(0.585–1.431)

0.696

0.844(0.503–1.417)

0.522

0.806(0.493–1.318)

0.390

 Poor

4.009(1.075–14.952)

0.039

3.452(1.009–11.805)

0.048

6.117(1.575–23.763)

0.009

4.793(1.374–16.725)

0.014

Macrovascular invasion

0.973(0.502–1.883)

0.934

  

0.723(0.339–1.542)

0.401

  

Microvascular invasion

1.547(0.981–2.440)

0.060

1.472(0.978–2.215)

0.064

1.548(0.955–2.511)

0.076

1.395(0.889–2.189)

0.147

Capsule

0.970(0.527–1.788)

0.923

  

1.073(0.551–2.090)

0.835

  

Satellite lesion

0.722(0.345–1.511)

0.387

  

0.475(0.205–1.103)

0.083

0.520(0.236–1.144)

0.104

  1. DFS disease-free survival, OS overall survival, LND lymph nodes dissection