Skip to main content

Table 4 Comparison of the clinical characteristics of EC patients undergoing laparoscopic and open surgery in different institutions

From: Laparoscopic vs. open procedure for intermediate‑ and high‑risk endometrial cancer: a minimum 4-year follow-up analysis

Author (Year)

Surgery type

Age, years

OT, hours

EBL, ml

Disease recurrence, n (%)

Death events, n (%)

Present study

Laparoscopic approach (n = 136)

53.1 ± 7.9

3.7 ± 1.3

190.90 ± 133.43

10 (7.4%)

7 (5.1%)

Open approach (n = 65)

52.9 ± 10.4

3.3 ± 1.0

247.87 ± 201.71

17 (26.2%)

10 (15.4%)

Monterossi (2017) [18]

Laparoscopic approach (n = 141)

67 (40–92)

2.7 (0.7–8.0)

100 (10–500)

25 (17.7%)

19 (13.5%)

Open approach (n = 142)

69 (37–90)

2.6 (0.8–7.4)

250 (20–1000)

45 (31.7%)

35 (24.6%)

Zhang (2013) [19]

Laparoscopic approach (n = 151)

56.6 (27–82)

3.5 (1.7–7.7)

86 (5–450)

7 (4.6%)

9 (6.0%)

Open approach (n = 121)

57.2 (29–79)

3.9 (1.5–9.5)

419 (20–4000)

6 (5.0%)

12 (9.9%)

Janda (2017) [20]

Laparoscopic approach (n = 407)

63.3 ± 10.0

2.2 (0.8–5.0)

unknown

33 (8.1%)

16 (3.9%)

Open approach (n = 353)

63.1 ± 10.6

1.8 (0.6–4.2)

unknown

28 (7.9%)

14 (4.0%)

Walker (2012) [21]

Laparoscopic approach (n = 1696)

62.8 (55.4–71.6)

unknown

unknown

210 (12.4%)

229 (13.5%)

Open approach (n = 920)

62.7 (54.9–70.6)

unknown

unknown

99 (10.8%)

121 (13.2%)