Skip to main content

Table 3 Hazard ratios (HRs) for the association of TG, FBG or HDL-C with CRC risk

From: Association between the TyG index and TG/HDL-C ratio as insulin resistance markers and the risk of colorectal cancer

Group

Cases/person-years

Crude models

Adjusted models

HR (95%CI)

p-value

HR (95%CI)

p-value

TG (continuous, per SD)

593/1145910

1.05(1.00,1.11)

0.051

1.05(0.99,1.10)

0.089

Quartiles of TG

     

 Q1 (≤0.90)

109/294585

Ref.

 

Ref.

 

 Q2 (0.90 ~ 1.27)

142/281968

1.36(1.06,1.75)

0.016

1.30(1.01,1.67)

0.041

 Q3 (1.27 ~ 1.93)

179/284244

1.70(1.34,2.15)

< 0.001

1.58(1.24,2.01)

< 0.001

 Q4 (≥1.93)

163/285114

1.54(1.21,1.96)

0.017

1.45(1.13,1.85)

0.003

 pfor trend

  

< 0.001

 

0.002

FBG (continuous, per SD)

593/1145910

1.06(1.02,1.10)

0.006

1.05(1.01,1.09)

0.009

Definition of diabetesa

     

 None (<  6.1 mmol/L)

144/289661

Ref.

 

Ref.

 

 IFG or IGT (6.1 ~ 7.0)

128/290728

1.23(0.93,1.63)

0.141

1.09(0.83,1.44)

0.538

 Diabetes (≥ 7.0 mmol/l)

188/280042

1.59(1.24,2.05)

< 0.001

1.33(1.03,1.72)

0.029

 pfor trend

  

< 0.001

 

0.086

HDL-C (continuous, per SD)

593/1145910

1.21(0.99,1.47)

0.059

1.09(0.89,1.32)

0.402

Quartiles of HDL-C

     

 Q1 (≤1.28)

162/290143

Ref.

 

Ref.

 

 Q2 (1.28 ~ 1.51)

126/293293

0.77(0.61,0.97)

0.027

0.77(0.61,0.97)

0.028

 Q3 (1.51 ~ 1.77)

131/285994

0.82(0.65,1.03)

0.093

0.82(0.65,1.03)

0.088

 Q4 (≥1.77)

174/276480

1.12(0.91,1.39)

0.288

1.02(0.82,1.27)

0.856

 pfor trend

  

0.003

 

0.031

  1. Adjusted models include age (every 10 years), sex, family income, educational background, marital status, WC, TC, smoking status, drinking status, physical activity, sedentary lifestyle, tea consumption, salt intake, high-fat diet, hypertension, and family history of cancer
  2. Results presented with bold valued were statistically significant with all p values < 0.05
  3. a IFG impaired fasting glucose, IGT impaired glucose tolerance