Skip to main content

Table 3 Joint effect of preoperative CEA and CA19-9 on colorectal cancer outcomes

From: Preoperative serum CA19-9 should be routinely measured in the colorectal patients with preoperative normal serum CEA: a multicenter retrospective cohort study

Outcome

Model 1

Model 2

Model 3

Model 4

Hazard Ratio

(95% CI)

P Value

Hazard Ratio (95% CI)

P Value

Hazard Ratio (95% CI)

P Value

Hazard Ratio (95% CI)

P Value

RFS

 Normal CEA & normal CA19-9

Reference

 

Reference

 

Reference

 

Reference

 

 Normal CEA & elevated CA19-9

2.32 (1.87–2.88)

 < 0.001

2.38 (1.92–2.96)

 < 0.001

2.08 (1.65–2.62)

 < 0.001

2.00 (1.46–2.72)

 < 0.001

 Elevated CEA & normal CA19-9

1.54 (1.37–1.73)

 < 0.001

1.52 (1.35–1.71)

 < 0.001

1.50 (1.32–1.70)

 < 0.001

1.65 (1.40–1.95)

 < 0.001

 Elevated CEA & elevated CA19-9

2.41 (2.08–2.8)

 < 0.001

2.38 (2.05–2.76)

 < 0.001

2.31 (1.97–2.71)

 < 0.001

2.76 (2.24–3.39)

 < 0.001

OS

 Normal CEA & normal CA19-9

Reference

 

Reference

 

Reference

 

Reference

 

 Normal CEA & elevated CA19-9

2.85 (2.18–3.72)

 < 0.001

3.02 (2.31–3.94)

 < 0.001

2.52 (1.88–3.37)

 < 0.001

2.20 (1.46–3.32)

 < 0.001

 Elevated CEA & normal CA19-9

1.76 (1.51–2.05)

 < 0.001

1.70 (1.46–1.98)

 < 0.001

1.70 (1.45–2.01)

 < 0.001

1.90 (1.52–2.38)

 < 0.001

 Elevated CEA & elevated CA19-9

2.89 (2.40–3.48)

 < 0.001

2.75 (2.28–3.32)

 < 0.001

2.62 (2.14–3.21)

 < 0.001

3.23 (2.46–4.24)

 < 0.001

  1. Note: CA 19–9 carbohydrate antigen 19–9, CEA carcinoembryonic antigen, OS overall survival, RFS recurrence-free survival
  2. Elevated CEA ≥ 5 ng/ml, normal CEA < 5 ng/ml; elevated CA 19–9 ≥ 37 U/ml, normal CA 19–9 < 37 U/ml
  3. Model 1 was unadjusted. Model 2 was adjusted for sex (female vs. male), age. Model 3 was adjusted for sex (female vs. male), age, primary site (rectum vs. colon), surgical approach (open resection vs. laparoscopic resection), pathology stage (III → II), lymph node yield (≥ 12 vs. < 12), tumor differentiation (poor-undifferentiated vs. moderate vs. well), mucinous (colloid) type (yes vs. no), lymphovascular invasion / perineural invasion (yes vs. no), adjuvant chemotherapy (yes vs. no). Model 4 was adjusted for sex (female vs. male), age, primary site (rectum vs. colon), surgical approach (open resection vs. laparoscopic resection), pathology stage (III → II), lymph node yield (≥ 12 vs. < 12), tumor differentiation (poor-undifferentiated vs. moderate vs. well), mucinous (colloid) type (yes vs. no), lymphovascular invasion / perineural invasion (yes vs. no), adjuvant chemotherapy (yes vs. no), microsatellite instability (yes vs. no)