Skip to main content

Table 8 Summary of trial-level sensitivity analysis (Linear regression)

From: Validating ORR and PFS as surrogate endpoints in phase II and III clinical trials for NSCLC patients: difference exists in the strength of surrogacy in various trial settings

Sensitivity Analysis

No. of trials

Slope estimate

95%CI

R2

Adjusted R2

Threshold

ΔORR ~ HR of OSa

 Line of therapy

  First-line

39

0.019

0.013, 0.024

0.570

0.558

−28.01%

   ≥ 2nd-line

64

0.008

0.004, 0.012

0.166

0.153

——b

 Phase of trial

  Phase II

60

0.010

0.406, 0.014

0.294

0.282

——b

  Phase III

52

0.012

0.007, 0.018

0.267

0.252

——b

 Masking

  Double-blind

35

0.016

0.009, 0.023

0.365

0.345

——b

  Open-label

76

0.007

0.004, 0.011

0.176

0.165

——b

Overall

112

0.011

0.007, 0.014

0.261

0.254

——b

ΔORR ~ HR of PFSa

 Line of therapy

  First-line

36

0.023

0.018, 0.029

0.641

0.630

−23.25%

   ≥ 2nd-line

68

0.023

0.018, 0.029

0.528

0.521

−29.95%

 Phase of trial

  Phase II

60

0.023

0.018, 0.028

0.588

0.581

−35.82%

  Phase III

54

0.023

0.017, 0.028

0.568

0.560

−19.28%

 Masking

  Double-blind

36

0.018

0.012, 0.025

0.468

0.453

−33.76%

  Open-label

77

0.025

0.021, 0.030

0.640

0.636

−24.42%

Overall

114

0.023

0.019, 0.027

0.578

0.574

−26.30%

HR of PFSa ~ HR of OSa

 Line of therapy

  First-line

48

0.555

0.419, 0.691

0.580

0.571

0.49

   ≥ 2nd-line

81

0.333

0.217, 0.449

0.286

0.277

——b

 Phase of trial

  Phase II

62

0.374

0.255, 0.492

0.390

0.380

——b

  Phase III

72

0.427

0.302, 0.553

0.390

0.382

0.41

 Masking

  Double-blind

42

0.793

0.610, 0.977

0.642

0.633

0.48

  Open-label

95

0.276

0.178, 0.374

0.246

0.238

——b

Overall

138

0.403

0.313, 0.494

0.360

0.355

——b

  1. aNatural log hazard ratio in the analysis
  2. bOnly the upper limit of rs is more than 0.7, the STE will be given