Skip to main content

Table 3 Uni- and multivariable logistic regression analysis on the desmoplastic growth pattern

From: The relationship between primary colorectal cancer histology and the histopathological growth patterns of corresponding liver metastases

 

Univariable

Multivariable (n = 182)

OR [95%CI]

p-value

OR [95%CI]

p-value

CRLM characteristics

 Disease-free intervala (cont.)—months

0.98 [0.96–1.01]

0.18

0.99 [0.96–1.02]

0.54

 Number of CRLM (cont.)

0.93 [0.72–1.21]

0.60

-

-

 Diameter of largest CRLM (cont.)—cm

0.58 [0.41–0.81]

 < 0.01

0.55 [0.37–0.82]

 < 0.01

 Preoperative CEA (cont.)—100 µg/L

0.42 [0.10–1.68]

0.22

-

-

 Extrahepatic disease—yes vs no

0.28 [0.04–2.22]

0.23

-

-

Classical markers

 Right-sided tumour—yes vs no

0.44 [0.16–1.23]

0.12

0.50 [0.16–1.60]

0.24

 pT4-stage—yes vs no

0.35 [0.08–1.56]

0.17

0.43 [0.08–2.26]

0.32

 Positive lymph nodes—yes vs no

0.58 [0.27–1.26]

0.17

0.65 [0.25–1.69]

0.38

 Tumour deposits—yes vs no

0.40 [0.11–1.41]

0.15

0.48 [0.08–2.95]

0.43

Invasion markers

 (lympho-)vascular invasion—yes vs no

0.42 [0.17–1.04]

0.06

0.68 [0.22–2.12]

0.51

 Extramural vascular invasion—yes vs no

0.59 [0.26–1.38]

0.22

-

-

 Perineural invasion—yes vs no

0.43 [0.14–1.30]

0.14

1.11 [0.28–4.46]

0.89

Tumour interface markers

 Peritumoural budding—Grade II/III vs I

0.44 [0.12–1.53]

0.19

0.51 [0.13–2.02]

0.34

 CRC growth pattern—Infiltrative vs expanding

0.65 [0.30–1.42]

0.28

-

-

 Non-mature stroma—yes vs no

0.21 [0.06–0.73]

0.01

0.29 [0.07–1.25]

0.10

Immunological markers

 TIL density (cont.)—10%

1.69 [1.15–2.47]

 < 0.01

1.60 [1.01–2.54]

0.05

  1. Abbreviations in alphabetical order: Cont. entered as continous variable, CEA carcinoembryonic antigen, CI confidence interval, CRC colorectal cancer, CRLM colorectal liver metastasis, OR odds ratio, TIL tumour-infiltrating lymfocyte.
  2. aBetween resection of primary tumor and detection of CRLM