Skip to main content

Table 2 Performances of the six machine learning classifiers for predicting HER2 status in the validation cohort

From: Development and validation of a clinicoradiomic nomogram to assess the HER2 status of patients with invasive ductal carcinoma

Radiomics classifier

Accuracy

True positive rate (Sensitivity)

True negative rate (Specificity)

Threshold

AUC(95%CI)

LR

0.750

0.893

0.621

0.514

0.810 (0.709–0.905)

LDA

0.733

0.829

0.718

0.547

0.801 (0.701–0.901)

SVM

0.756

0.821

0.724

0.545

0.840 (0.758–0.922)

RF

0.744

0.857

0.689

0.546

0.826 (0.738–0.914)

NB

0.755

0.786

0.741

0.527

0.788 (0.694–0.882)

XGB

0.710

0.857

0.637

0.494

0.790 (0.688–0.891)

  1. LR Logistic Regression, LDA Linear Discriminant Analysis, SVM Support Vector Machine, RF Random Forest, NB Naive Bayesian, XGB XGBoost