Skip to main content

Table 1 Clinical and histopathologic characteristics of IDC patients

From: Development and validation of a clinicoradiomic nomogram to assess the HER2 status of patients with invasive ductal carcinoma

Characteristics

Train Cohort

P value

Validation Cohort

HER2 + (n = 42)

HER2-(n = 86)

HER2 + (n = 28)

HER2-(n = 58)

Ki-67

47.98 ± 20.51

33.35 ± 23.04

0.94

46.25 ± 23.16

34.62 ± 27.30

Patient age

  

0.166

  

  < 35 (youth)

 

1(1.16)

 

3(10.71)

1(1.72)

 30–50 (middle-aged)

26(61.90)

60(69.77)

 

17(60.71)

36(62.07)

  > 50 (menopause)

16(38.10)

25(29.07)

 

8(28.57)

21(36.21)

Location = Central District

  

0.243

  

 No

38(90.48)

73(84.88)

 

24(85.71)

55(94.83)

 Yes

4(9.52)

13(15.12)

 

4(14.29)

3(5.17)

Position = upper-right quadrant

  

0.209

  

 No

32(76.19)

63(73.26)

 

18(64.29)

39(67.24)

 Yes

10(23.81)

23(26.74)

 

10(35.71)

19(32.76)

Position = Lower-right quadrant

  

0.5

  

 No

34(80.95)

75(87.21)

 

24(85.71)

52(89.66)

 Yes

8(19.05)

11(12.79)

 

4(14.29)

6(10.34)

Position = Upper left quadrant

  

0.463

  

 No

25(59.52)

52(60.47)

 

20(71.43)

36(62.07)

 Yes

17(40.48)

34(39.53)

 

8(28.57)

22(37.93)

Position = Lower left quadrant

  

0.05

  

 No

37(88.10)

78(90.70)

 

22(78.57)

47(81.03)

 Yes

5(11.90)

8(9.30)

 

6(21.43)

11(18.97)

Histologicalgrades

  

0.256

  

 Stage I

1(2.38)

5(5.81)

  

9(15.52)

 Stage II

11(26.19)

56(65.12)

 

12(42.86)

32(55.17)

 Stage III

30(71.43)

25(29.07)

 

16(57.14)

17(29.31)

Lymph node metastasis

  

0.534

  

 0

24(57.14)

51(59.30)

 

13(46.43)

29(50.00)

 1

9(21.43)

21(24.42)

 

7(25.00)

19(32.76)

 2

5(11.90)

9(10.47)

 

6(21.43)

6(10.34)

 3

4(9.52)

5(5.81)

 

2(7.14)

4(6.90)