From: Systematic review of circulating MICRORNAS as biomarkers of cervical carcinogenesis
Author | Year | Detection Method | Normalize. | Method for expression level calculation | Differentially expressed microRNAs between HPV+ e HPV - samples | Differentially expressed microRNAs between CIN or CC and C | Up or down regulation description only | AUC | SEN | SPE | Main results description |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liu; Xin; Ma [11] | 2015 | qPCR | RNU6B | 2−ΔΔCt | MiR-196a expression levels are not correlated to HPV infection | miR-196a | Yes | N/A | N/A | N/A | CC Patients showed a significantly higher level of serum miR-196a than CIN patients p < 0.05) and controls (p < 0.01). CIN patients expressed higher MiR-196a levels than C volunteers (p < 0.05). 67% of CIN III patients showed significantly higher expression of miR-196 than CIN II(32%) and CIN I (21%) patients. CC Patients with higher miR-196a serum levels had a poorer overall survival rate. |
Zhang et al. [8] | 2015 | qPCR | cel-miR-67 | 2−ΔΔCt | N/I | miR-497 miR-16-2 miR-195 miR-2861 | No | 4 miRs: CC vs. C: 0.849 CC vs. NIC: 0.829 NIC vs. C: 0,734 | 4 miRs: CC vs. C: 73,1% CC vs. NIC: 71,4% NIC vs. C: 62,6% | 4 miRs: CC vs. C: 88,4% CC vs. NIC: 67,2% NIC vs. C: 88,9% | MIR-195 expression level was significantly decreased, while miR-16-2* and miR-497 were significantly increased in CC patients, compared to CIN and control groups. miR-2861 expression levels are significantly decreased in CIN and CC patients compared to the control group. |
Nagamitsu et al. [12] | 2016 | qPCR | miR-16 | 2−ΔΔCt | N/I | miR-1290 | No | CC vs. C: 0.7957 | CC vs. C: 90.3% | CC vs. C: 62.2% | MiR-1290 expression level was significantly elevated in CC patients compared to CIN and control patients. MiR-1290 increased expression was also related to the CC stage. |
Sun et al. [13] | 2016 | qPCR | Geometric mean of miR-16 miR-223 and miR-31 | 2−ΔΔCt | N/I | miR-425-5p | Yes | N/A | N/A | N/A | MiR-425-5p expression levels were significantly the higher in CC group compared to CIN (p< 0.0001) or control groups (p< 0.0001). Elevated levels of miR-425-5p were significantly correlated with TNM stage (p = 0.0003) and lymph node metastasis (p = 0.0037). High levels of serum miR-425have expression that has been correlated with poor overall survival. |
Kong et al. [14] | 2017 | qPCR | Cel-39-3p | 2−ΔΔCt | MiR-92a expression levels are not correlated to HPV infection | hsa-mir-92a | No | 0,83 | 69.6% | 80.4% | Serum miR-92a levels were significantly higher in CIN and CC patients than in healthy subjects (p< 0.01). MiR-92a expression was also significantly higher in patients with advanced-stage CC than in those with early-stage CC. |
Wei; Wen-Ming; Jun-Bo [15] | 2017 | qPCR | RNU6B | 2−ΔΔCt | Lower plasmatic miR-145 expression levels significantly associated to HPV infection (p 0,016) | miR-145 | No | CC vs. C: 0,848 CC vs. CIN: 0,828 | CC vs. C: 81,7% CC vs. CIN: 91,7% | CC vs. C: 63,3% CC vs. CIN: 54,2% | MiR-145 plasma levels were significantly lower in CC patients than in CIN patients and healthy controls (p < 0.01). CC patients who achiea ved complete response to radiotherapy had higher plasma miR-145 levels than incomplete responders (p 0.005). |
Wang et al. [16] | 2018 | qPCR | U6 | 2−ΔΔCt | N/I | miR-1266 | Yes | N/A | N/A | N/A | Serum miR-126upregulatedulated in CC patients also correlates with metastatic progression. Serum MiR-1266 expression was significantly higher in patients with LSIL, HSIL and CC compared to healthy controls (p< 0.05). CC patients with high miR-1266 expression had lower overall survival rates than patients with low miR-1266 expression. |
Farzanehpour et al. [17] | 2019 | qPCR | U6 | 2−ΔΔCt | N/I | miR-9 miR-192 miR-205 | No | CC vs. C miR-9: 0,99 miR-192: miR-205: 0,96 CIN vs. C miR-9: 0,90 miR-192: 0,98 miR-205: 0,75 CC vs. CIN miR-9: 0,85 miR-192: 0,82 miR-205: 0,75 | CC vs. C miR-9: 100% miR-192: 100% miR-205: 88,2% CIN vs. C miR-9: 77,8% miR-192: 83,3% miR-205: 66,7% CC vs. CIN miR-9: 52,9% miR-192: 58,8% miR-205: 35,3% | CC vs. C miR-9: 94,4% miR-192: 94,4% miR-205: 88,9% CIN vs. C miR-9: 94,4% miR-192: 94,4% miR-205: 88,9% CC vs. CIN miR-9: 94,4% miR-192: 83,3% miR-205: 94,4% | Increased expression levels of miR-9, miR-192 and miR-205 were observed in the CC group compared to normal samples (p< 0.0001). MiR-9, miR-192, and miR-205 expression levels were significantly increased in the CIN group compared to the control group. MiR-205 expression showed to be increased in the CC group compared to the CIN group (p< 0.0001). |
Wang et al. [18] | 2019 | qPCR | U6 | 2−ΔΔCt | N/I | miR-21 miR-214 miR-34a miR-200a | No | CIN I- vs. CIN II+ miR-21: 0,613 miR-34a: 0,508 miR-200a: 0,615 miR-214: 0,505 | N/I | N/I | MiRNA-21 plasma expression was increased in patients with cervical lesions (including CIN I, CIN II, CI, II,I and CC patients). MiRNA-21,−34a, and -200a expression levels were decreased in patients with severe cervical lesions (CIN I, CIN II, CIN, III and CC). Differences between these miRNAs expression levels were significant when comparing controls and CIN II e III patients(p< 0.05). |
Yang; Zhang [19] | 2019 | qPCR | U6 | 2−ΔΔCt | N/I | miR-152 | No | CIN vs. C: 0.831 CC vs. C: 0.935 | N/I | N/I | MiR-152 expression levels were increased in CIN patients compared to control and higher in CC patients. Furthermore, miR-152 expression level in peripheral blood was higher in patients with high-grade CIN compared to those with low-grade CIN. MiR-152 expression levels also increased with the CC stage and were associated with serum SCC-Ag levels. A miR-152 expression reduction was observed after treatment. |
Zheng et al. [20] | 2019 | Digital PCR | miR-128-3p miR-129-5p miR-320 let-7i-5p | R_score | N/I | let-7d-3p miR-30d-5p | No | let-7d-3p: 0.822 miR-30d-5p: 0.79 Combined: 0.828 | N/I | N/I | Let-7d-3p and miR-30d-5p expression levels were significantly decreased in CIN II + group when compared to CIN I – group. |
Zheng et al. [21] | 2020 | qPCR | cel-miR-39 | 2−ΔΔCt | N/I | miR-638 miR-203a-3p miR-1914-5p miR-521 | No | CC vs. CIN miR-638: 0,681 miR-203a-3p: 0,651 miR-1914-5p: 0,717 miR-521: 0,716 CC vs. C miR-638: 0,734 miR-203a-3p: 0,660 miR-1914-5p: 0,626 miR-521: 0,742 | CC vs. CIN miR-638: 85% miR-203a-3p: 42,5% miR-1914-5p: 82,5% miR-521: 62,5% CC vs. C miR-638: 80% miR-203a-3p: 75% miR-1914-5p: 85% miR-521: 80% | CC vs. CIN miR-638: 46,15% miR-203a-3p: 82,05% miR-1914-5p: 61,54% miR-521: 76,92% CC vs. C miR-638: 60,98% miR-203a-3p: 53,66% miR-1914-5p: 43,90% miR-521: 65,85% | Lower expression levels of miR-638, miR-203a-3p, miR-1914-5p and and MiR-521 were observed in the group compared to CIN. Furthermore, miR-638, miR-203a-3,p and miR-521 expression levels were lower in CC patients compared to healthy controls. |
Qiu et al [22] | 2020 | qPCR | cel-miR-39 | 2−ΔΔCt | N/I | miR-21 miR-125b miR-370 | No | CC vs. C miR-21: 0,783 miR-125b: 0,642 miR-370: 0,822 CC vs. CIN miR-21: 0,689 miR-125b: 0,735 miR-370: 0,821 Combined CC vs. C: 0,912 CC vs. CIN: 0,897 | N/I | N/I | Higher miR-21 serum expression was observed in CC than in CIN and healthy women. The expression of miR-125b and miR-370 was lower in CC women compared to healthy and CIN patients. Combined expression of the three miRNAs performed well to identify early-stage CC compared to CIN or healthy controls. High levels of miR-21 and low levels of miR-125b and miR-370 were associated with metastasis and recurrences. |
Aftab et al [23] | 2021 | qPCR | snRNA U6 | 2−ΔΔCt | Lower miRNA-145-5p expression in samples LSIL/HSIL HPV 16 + and CC HPV 16+ samples. | miR-21-5p miR-199a-5p miR-155-5p miR-34a-5p miR-145-5p miR-218-5p | No | miR-21-5p: 0,97 miR-199a-5p: 0,831 miR-155-5p: 0,719 miR-34a-5p: 0,888 miR-145-5p: 0,575 miR-218-5p: 0,609 Combined: 0,942 miR-21-5p miR-199a-5p miR-155-5p Combined: 0,969 miR-34a-5p miR-145-5p miR-218-5p Combined: 1 miR-21-5p miR-199a-5p miR-155-5p miR-34a-5p miR-145-5p miR-218-5p | miR-21-5p: 88 miR-199a-5p: 86.7 miR-155-5p: 93.8 miR-34a-5p: 89.1 miR-145-5p: 67.7 miR-218-5p: 83.3 Combined: 100 miR-21-5p miR-199a-5p miR-155-5p Combined: 100 miR-34a-5p miR-145-5p miR-218-5p Combined: 100 miR-21-5p miR-199a-5p miR-155-5p miR-34a-5p miR-145-5p miR-218-5p | miR-21-5p: 98 miR-199a-5p: 91.7 miR-155-5p: 88.3 miR-34a-5p: 91.7 miR-145-5p: 60 miR-218-5p: 72.7 Combined: 78.9 miR-21-5p miR-199a-5p miR-155-5p Combined: 92.8 miR-34a-5p miR-145-5p miR-218-5p Combined: 100 miR-21-5p miR-199a-5p miR-155-5p miR-34a-5p miR-145-5p miR-218-5p | Significant up-regulation of miR-21-5p, miR-199a-5p and miR-155-5p and down-regulation of miR-145-5p, miR-34a-5p and miR-218-5p was observed in women with LSIL/HSIL and CC when compared to healthy controls. |
Hoelzle et al [24] | 2021 | qPCR | miR-23a-3p | 2−ΔΔCt | Higher plasmatic miR-let-7a expression levels awithociated with HPV infection | miR-21 miR-let-7a miR-214 | Yes | N/I | N/I | N/I | No significant differences were found between groups. |
Ocadiz-Delgado et al [25] | 2021 | qPCR | Beta2mHu | 2−ΔΔCt | N/I | miR-15b miR-34a miR-218 | No | LSIL miR-34a: 0,9952 miR-15b: 0,6765 miR-218: 0,9872 CC miR-34a: 0,9505 miR-15b: 0,8173 miR-218: 0,8421 | N/I | N/I | MiR-15b expression was higher in LSIL group and even higher in CC patients compared to healthy controls. MiR-34a and miR-218 expression increased in LSIL and decreased in CC, compared to control group. |
Yamanaka et al [26] | 2021 | qPCR | miR-16 | 2−ΔΔCt | N/I | miR-100 | No | 0,879 | 91,2% | 80,4% | MiR-100 serum expression was high in healthy women, intermediate in women with CIN and low in CC women. |