Skip to main content

Table 2 Cox regression model estimates of the significance of predictive factors for overall survival

From: Prognostic impact of stromal periostin expression in upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma

Variables

p value

HR (95% CI)

(a) Univariate Cox regression model

  Non-papillary gross finding

0.062

1.76 (0.97–3.18)

  Pathological T category ≥ 2

0.086

1.94 (0.91–4.12)

  Pathological T category ≥ 3

0.018

2.03 (1.13–3.63)

  High grade tumor

0.87

1.17 (0.16–8.54)

  Lymphovascular invasion

 < 0.0001

3.27 (1.84–5.80)

  Concomitant subtype histology

0.097

1.68 (0.91–3.09)

  Concomitant carcinoma in situ

0.23

0.61 (0.28–1.37)

  Pathological lymph node metastasisa

0.043

2.34 (0.99–5.54)

  Positive surgical margin

0.020

2.39 (1.15–4.96)

  High budding

 < 0.0001

3.82 (2.19–6.67)

  High TAICs (score 2–3)

0.51

1.20 (0.69–2.09)

  High periostin expression

 < 0.0001

4.92 (2.68–9.01)

(b) Multivariate Cox regression model

  Pathological T category ≥ 3

0.42

0.74 (0.35–1.55)

  Lymphovascular invasion

0.074

1.97 (0.94–4.13)

  Pathological lymph node metastasisa

0.73

0.82 (0.27–2.47)

  Positive surgical margin

0.31

1.59 (0.65–3.89)

  High budding

0.43

1.38 (0.62–3.04)

  High periostin expression

0.00072

3.62 (1.72–7.64)

  1. CI Confidence interval, HR Hazard ratio, TAICs Tumor-associated immune cell status
  2. a Pathologically positive nodes vs. pathologically negative nodes/no lymph node dissection