From: Prognostic impact of stromal periostin expression in upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma
Variables | p value | HR (95% CI) |
---|---|---|
(a) Univariate Cox regression model | ||
  Non-papillary gross finding | 0.062 | 1.76 (0.97–3.18) |
  Pathological T category ≥ 2 | 0.086 | 1.94 (0.91–4.12) |
  Pathological T category ≥ 3 | 0.018 | 2.03 (1.13–3.63) |
  High grade tumor | 0.87 | 1.17 (0.16–8.54) |
  Lymphovascular invasion |  < 0.0001 | 3.27 (1.84–5.80) |
  Concomitant subtype histology | 0.097 | 1.68 (0.91–3.09) |
  Concomitant carcinoma in situ | 0.23 | 0.61 (0.28–1.37) |
  Pathological lymph node metastasisa | 0.043 | 2.34 (0.99–5.54) |
  Positive surgical margin | 0.020 | 2.39 (1.15–4.96) |
  High budding |  < 0.0001 | 3.82 (2.19–6.67) |
  High TAICs (score 2–3) | 0.51 | 1.20 (0.69–2.09) |
  High periostin expression |  < 0.0001 | 4.92 (2.68–9.01) |
(b) Multivariate Cox regression model | ||
  Pathological T category ≥ 3 | 0.42 | 0.74 (0.35–1.55) |
  Lymphovascular invasion | 0.074 | 1.97 (0.94–4.13) |
  Pathological lymph node metastasisa | 0.73 | 0.82 (0.27–2.47) |
  Positive surgical margin | 0.31 | 1.59 (0.65–3.89) |
  High budding | 0.43 | 1.38 (0.62–3.04) |
  High periostin expression | 0.00072 | 3.62 (1.72–7.64) |