Skip to main content

Table 4 Diagnostic performance of LI-RADS v2018 and non-invasive model in each cohort

From: Non-invasive diagnosis strategy of hepatocellular carcinoma in low-risk population

 

Model

AUC %

(95% CI)

ACC

(no.)

SEN

(no.)

SPE

(no.)

PPV

(no.)

NPV

(no.)

Training cohort

n = 324

LI-RAD v2018

81.6

(77.0–86.1)

83.0 (269/324)

76.8 (86/112)

86.3 (183/212)

74.8 (86/115)

87.6 (183/209)

Imaging model

90.0

(86.3–93.6)

75.3 (244/324)

31.3 (35/112)

98.6 (209/212)

92.1 (35/38)

73.1 (209/286)

Clinical model

95.4

(93.0–97.8)

89.2 (289/324)

77.7 (87/112)

95.3 (202/212)

89.7 (87/97)

89.0 (202/227)

Internal validation cohort

n = 139

LI-RAD v2018

81.2

(74.6–87.8)

81.3 (113/139)

80.7 (50/62)

81.8 (63/77)

78.1 (50/64)

84

(63/75)

Imaging model

85.9

(79.3–92.4)

74.1 (103/139)

51.6 (32/62)

92.2 (71/77)

84.2 (32/38)

70.3 (71/101)

Clinical model

93.1

(88.6–97.5)

88.5 (123/139)

79.0 (49/62)

96.1 (74/77)

94.2 (49/52)

85.1 (74/87)

External validation cohort

n = 218

LI-RAD v2018

73.6

(67.8–79.4)

73.4 (160/218)

78.9 (82/104)

68.4 (78/114)

69.5 (82/118)

78.0 (78/100)

Imaging model

81.3

(75.5–87.1)

71.6 (156/218)

53.9 (56/104)

87.7 (100/114)

80.0 (56/70)

67.6 (100/148)

Clinical model

90.2

(86.0–94.4)

85.3 (186/218)

81.7 (85/104)

88.6 (101/114)

86.7 (85/98)

84.2 (101/120)

  1. Abbreviations: HCC hepatocellular carcinoma, PPV positive predictive value, NPV negative predictive value, CI confidence intervals, ACC accuracy, AUC area under curve, SEN sensitivity, SPE specificity