Skip to main content

Table 1 Patient demographics and clinical characteristics at index (date of nivolumab initiation)

From: Real-world treatment sequencing and survival in previously treated advanced renal cell carcinoma patients receiving nivolumab monotherapy: a UK retrospective cohort study

Variable

LOT Nivolumab was received

p-valueb

All patients at index datea

(n = 151)

2L

(n = 109)

3L + 

(n = 42)

n, % (95% CI) unless otherwise stated

Age (years)

 Mean (SD)

66.9 (10.0)

67.2 (10.2)

66.2 (9.4)

0.58

 Median (IQR)

66.9 (60.4,74.3)

67.4 (59.8,75.3)

66.2 (60.9,70.9)

Sex

 Female

42, 27.8% (21.3,35.4)

28, 25.7% (18.4,34.6)

14, 33.3% (21.0,48.4)

0.46

 Male

109, 72.2% (64.6,78.7)

81, 74.3% (65.4,81.6)

28, 66.7% (51.6,79.0)

Time from aRCC diagnosis to index datea(years)

 Mean (SD)

2.6 (2.5)

2.0 (1.8)

4.2 (3.1)

 < 0.01a

 Median (IQR)

2.0 (0.9,3.6)

1.4 (0.7,2.9)

3.4 (2.0,5.9)

ECOG PS at indexa

 0 (fully active)

49, 32.5% (25.5,40.3)

38, 34.9% (26.6,44.2)

11, 26.2% (15.3,41.1)

0.66

 1 (restrictive)

59, 39.1% (31.7,47.0)

42, 38.5% (29.9,47.9)

17, 40.5% (27.0,55.5)

 2 (off-work)

19, 12.6% (8.2,18.8)

13, 11.9% (7.1,19.3)

6, 14.3% (6.7,27.8)

 3 (limited)

3, 2.0% (0.7,5.7)

3, 2.8% (0.9,7.8)

0, 0.0% (0.0,8.4)

 4 (bedbound)

0, 0.0% (0.0,2.5)

0, 0.0% (0.0,3.4)

0, 0.0% (0.0,8.4)

 Not available§

21, 13.9%

13, 12%

8, 19.1%

IMDC classification (Heng points) at indexa

 Favourable (0)

23, 15.2% (10.4,21.8)

17, 15.6% (10.0,23.6)

6, 14.3% (6.7,27.8)

0.02a

 Intermediate (1–2)

60, 39.7% (32.3,47.7)

34, 31.2% (23.3,40.4)

26, 61.9% (46.8,75.0)

 Poor (3)

29, 19.2% (13.7,26.2)

25, 22.9% (16.0,31.7)

4, 9.5% (3.8,22.1)

 Unknown

39, 25.8% (19.5,33.4)

33, 30.3% (22.4,39.5)

6, 14.3% (6.7,27.8)

Histological subtype

 Clear Cell

131, 86.8% (80.4,91.3)

93, 85.3% (77.5,90.8)

38, 90.5% (77.9,96.2)

0.39

 Non-clear cell: papillary

7, 4.6% (2.3,9.3)

6, 5.5% (2.5,11.5)

1, 2.4% (0.1,12.3)

 Non-clear cell: collecting duct

0, 0.0% (0.0,2.5)

0, 0.0% (0.0,3.4)

0, 0.0% (0.0,8.4)

 Non-clear cell: chromophobe

4, 2.6% (1.0,6.6)

4, 3.7% (1.4,9.1)

0, 0.0% (0.0,8.4)

 Non-clear cell: sarcomatoid

2, 1.3% (0.4,4.7)

2, 1.8% (0.5,6.4)

0, 0.0% (0.0,8.4)

 Not available

7, 4.6%

4, 3.6%

3, 7.1%

Prior nephrectomy

 Yes

110, 72.8% (65.3,79.3)

76, 69.7% (60.5,77.6)

34, 81.0% (66.7,90.0)

0.24

Site of metastasis

 Bone

53, 35.1% (27.9,43.0)

37, 33.9% (25.7,43.2)

16, 38.1% (25.0,53.2)

0.77

 Brain

19, 12.6% (8.2,18.8)

15, 13.8% (8.5,21.5)

4, 9.5% (3.8,22.1)

0.67

 Soft tissue

12, 7.9% (4.6,13.4)

9, 8.3% (4.4,15.0)

3, 7.1% (2.5,19.0)

1.00

 Lung

116, 76.8% (69.5,82.8)

85, 78.0% (69.3,84.7)

31, 73.8% (58.9,84.7)

0.74

 Lymph nodes

65, 43.0% (35.4,51.0)

47, 43.1% (34.2,52.5)

18, 42.9% (29.1,57.8)

1.00

 Liver

43, 28.5% (21.9,36.1)

27, 24.8% (17.6,33.6)

16, 38.1% (25.0,53.2)

0.15

 Other

33, 21.9% (16.0,29.1)

20, 18.3% (12.2,26.6)

13, 31.0% (19.1,46.0)

0.14

 None

3, 2.0% (0.7,5.7)

3, 2.8% (0.9,7.8)

0, 0.0% (0.0,8.4)

0.66

  1. aIndex date defined as date of nivolumab initiation; bp-values for tests of differences between treatment subgroups (2L and 3L +); §Due to the re-synthesising of treatment pathways as a result of adjusting for intolerability, some data points, specifically ECOG PS were not collected and therefore have been labelled as information unavailable to differentiate from unknown data points
  2. aRCC Advanced renal cell carcinoma, CI Confidence interval, ECOG PS Eastern cooperative oncology group performance status, IMDC International metastatic renal cell carcinoma database consortium, LOT Line of therapy, N Total population, n Sampled population, SD Standard deviation