Skip to main content

Table 1 Main characteristics of the studies included in the meta-analysis

From: TP73-AS1 as a predictor of clinicopathological parameters and prognosis in human malignancies: a meta and bioinformatics analysis

Author

Year

Country

Cancer

Sample

Method

patients number

OS

DFS

Follow up

(months)

Data extraction method

NOS

Ref

high expression

low expression

total

HR (95% CL)

P

HR (95% CL)

P

Li

2017

China

hepatocellular carcinoma

tissue

qRT-PCR

42

42

84

2.25(1.14–4.43)

0.019

NM

NM

25

reported

8

[8]

Chen

2018

China

osteosarcoma

tissue

qRT-PCR

66

66

132

1.90(1.15–3.13)

0.012

NM

NM

72

reported

8

[27]

Ding

2018

China

gastric cancer

tissue

qRT-PCR

38

34

72

1.19(0.47–3.03)

0.710

NM

NM

60

K-M

7

[11]

Li

2018

China

ovarian cancer

tissue

qRT-PCR

36

26

62

2.16(1.05–4.46)

0.036

NM

NM

60

K-M

7

[28]

Liu

2018

China

ccRCC

tissue

qRT-PCR

24

16

40

1.00(0.10–9.97)

0.999

1.20(0.21–6.81)

0.840

50

K-M

6

[15]

Peng

2018

China

gastric cancer

tissue

qRT-PCR

27

31

58

2.49(1.06–5.83)

0.036

NM

NM

60

K-M

7

[12]

Tuo

2018

China

bladder cancer

tissue

qRT-PCR

64

64

128

0.79(0.24–2.63)

0.706

0.83(0.37–1.84)

0.639

60

K-M

7

[16]

Wang

2018

china

ovarian cancer

tissue

qRT-PCR

30

30

60

NM

NM

NM

NM

NM

NM

6

[17]

Wang

2018

China

gastric cancer

tissue

qRT-PCR

30

34

64

1.82(1.09–3.04)

0.022

2.14(1.26–3.63)

0.005

70

K-M

7

[13]

Yang

2018

China

osteosarcoma

tissue

qRT-PCR

23

23

46

1.92(0.71–5.18)

0.199

NM

NM

50

K-M

6

[10]

Yao

2018

China

breast cancer

tissue

qRT-PCR

18

18

36

3.34(1.03–10.82)

0.045

NM

NM

50

reported

8

[18]

Yao

2018

China

cholangiocarcinoma

tissue

qRT-PCR

41

34

75

NM

NM

NM

NM

NM

NM

6

[29]

Zhang

2018

China

NSCLC

tissue

qRT-PCR

22

23

45

1.76(0.65–4.74)

0.267

NM

NM

60

K-M

6

[21]

Zhang

2018

China

brain glioma

tissue

qRT-PCR

24

23

47

2.46(1.13–5.35)

0.023

NM

NM

40

reported

8

[24]

Zhang

2018

China

gastric cancer

tissue

qRT-PCR

41

35

76

1.42(0.72–2.81)

0.310

NM

NM

60

K-M

6

[14]

Zou

2018

China

breast cancer

tissue

qRT-PCR

43

43

86

NM

NM

NM

NM

NM

NM

6

[19]

Cui

2019

China

pancreatic cancer

tissue

qRT-PCR

45

32

77

2.14(1.18–3.87)

0.012

NM

NM

50

K-M

7

[25]

Jia

2019

China

colorectal cancer

tissue

qRT-PCR

30

31

61

NM

NM

NM

NM

NM

NM

8

[26]

Liu

2019

China

lung adenocarcinoma

tissue

qRT-PCR

37

43

80

1.60(0.45–5.71)

0.467

NM

NM

60

K-M

6

[23]

Ma

2019

China

hepatocellular carcinoma

tissue

qRT-PCR

30

30

60

NM

NM

NM

NM

NM

NM

6

[9]

Zhang

2019

China

cervical cancer

tissue

qRT-PCR

NM

NM

56

2.37(0.75–7.50)

0.142

NM

NM

60

K-M

7

[20]

Zhu

2019

China

NSCLC

tissue

qRT-PCR

33

39

72

0.88(0.28–2.76)

0.825

NM

NM

60

K-M

8

[22]

Li

2019

China

colorectal cancer

tissue

qRT-PCR

33

37

70

1.31(0.59–2.92)

0.510

NM

NM

60

K-M

7

[32]

Liu

2020

China

gastric cancer

tissue

qRT-PCR

34

34

68

NM

NM

NM

NM

NM

NM

6

[30]

Liu

2020

China

breast cancer

tissue

qRT-PCR

25

20

45

NM

NM

NM

NM

NM

NM

6

[31]

Wang

2020

China

retinoblastoma

tissue

qRT-PCR

37

33

70

2.72(0.85–8.68)

0.090

NM

NM

60

K-M

7

[33]

  1. Abbreviations: OS overall survival; DFS disease-free survival; HR hazard ratio; CI confidence interval; qRT-PCR quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction; NM not mentioned; K-M Kaplan–Meier plot; ccRCC Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma; NSCLC non-small cell lung cancer; NOS Newcastle–Ottawa Scale, Ref reference