From: Reflecting on the utility of standardized uptake values on 18F-FDG PET in nasopharyngeal carcinoma
Variables | Â | Multivariate analysis | |
---|---|---|---|
P | HR (95%CI) | ||
Test for LRFS | |||
 Age50 | <50 vs. ≥50 | 0.594 | 1.223(0.583-2.564) |
 T | T1-T2 vs. T3-T4 | 0.021 | 2.889(1.170-7.135) |
 N | N0-N1 vs. N2-N3 | 0.726 | 0.877(0.421-1.828) |
 Group | Low NTR vs. High NTR | 0.093 | 1.879(0.899-3.926) |
Test for RRFS | |||
 Age50 | <50 vs. ≥50 | 0.680 | 1.218(0.477-3.112) |
 T | T1-T2 vs. T3-T4 | 0.417 | 0.682(0.270-1.720) |
 N | N0-N1 vs. N2-N3 | 0.008 | 5.352(1.542-18.58) |
 Group | Low NTR vs. High NTR | 0.272 | 1.689(0.664-4.297) |
Test for DMFS | |||
 Age50 | <50 vs. ≥50 | 0.258 | 1.472(0.753-2.879) |
 T | T1-T2 vs. T3-T4 | 0.036 | 2.261(1.055-4.848) |
 N | N0-N1 vs. N2-N3 | <0.001 | 9.001(3.170-25.55) |
 Group | Low NTR vs. High NTR | 0.038 | 2.037(1.039-3.992) |
Test for PFS | |||
 Age50 | <50 vs. ≥50 | 0.020 | 1.748(1.091-2.799) |
 T | T1-T2 vs. T3-T4 | 0.029 | 1.760(1.059-2.926) |
 N | N0-N1 vs. N2-N3 | <0.001 | 2.730(1.648-4.522) |
 Group | Low NTR vs. High NTR | 0.041 | 1.636(1.021-2.621) |
Test for OS | |||
 Age50 | <50 vs. ≥50 | 0.105 | 1.826(0.881-3.786) |
 T | T1-T2 vs. T3-T4 | 0.532 | 1.268(0.602-2.670) |
 N | N0-N1 vs. N2-N3 | 0.014 | 2.777(1.232-6.260) |
 Group | Low NTR vs. High NTR | 0.013 | 2.543(1.214-5.325) |