Skip to main content

Table 4 Alternative RR thresholds

From: Cost-effectiveness of using artificial intelligence versus polygenic risk score to guide breast cancer screening

Strategy

Cost (in 1000 $)

Effectiveness (in QALYs)

ICER ($/QALY)

Panel A: RR threshold 1.3

 No screening

1,745,808

1,976,720

 Family history + no screening for low risk

1,823,664

1,978,241

Ext. dominated

 AI + no screening for low risk

1,845,197

1,980,697

24,994

 PRS + no screening for low risk

1,861,378

1,980,799

157,870

 Family history + biennial screening for low risk

1,879,254

1,980,731

Dominated

 PRS + biennial screening for low risk

1,921,493

1,978,380

Dominated

 AI + biennial screening for low risk

1,936,713

1,978,375

Dominated

 Annual screening for all

2,022,120

1,978,717

Dominated

Panel B: RR threshold 2

 No screening

1,745,808

1,976,720

 AI + no screening for low risk

1,813,821

1,980,868

16,398

 Family history + no screening for low risk

1,823,664

1,978,241

Dominated

 PRS + no screening for low risk

1,830,198

1,980,922

299,464

 Family history + biennial screening for low risk

1,879,254

1,980,731

Dominated

 AI + biennial screening for low risk

1,906,031

1,979,063

Dominated

 PRS + biennial screening for low risk

1,914,734

1,978,709

Dominated

 Annual screening for all

2,022,120

1,978,717

Dominated

  1. Note: ICER: Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio. All costs are in 2020 US dollars ($). Costs and effectiveness are calculated per 100,000 women. All strategies (except ‘No screening’) involve annual screening for women identified as high-risk. ‘AI’ refers to risk prediction accounting for both AI and other risk factors. ‘PRS’ refers to risk prediction accounting for both PRS and other risk factors. Beyond age 50, women without family history are screened biennially and those with family history are screened annually in all strategies except ‘No screening’ and ‘Annual screening for all’ strategies. In Panel A, ‘Family history + no screening for low risk’ is extended dominated. Hence, ICER for ‘AI + no screening for low risk’ is calculated relative to ‘No screening’