Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of the performance of the three models in predicting MSI status

From: Development and validation of a radiomics-based nomogram for the preoperative prediction of microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer

Models

AUC

Sensitivity

Specificity

Accuracy

PPV

NPV

Radiomics

 Training(n = 194)

0.81 (0.74–0.87)

0.67

0.81

0.77

0.57

0.86

 Validation (n = 82)

0.82 (0.72–0.92)

0.65

0.80

0.76

0.54

0.86

Clinics

 Training(n = 194)

0.85 (0.79–0.92)

0.77

0.88

0.84

0.70

0.89

 Validation (n = 82)

0.87 (0.79–0.95)

0.79

0.80

0.79

0.59

0.90

Nomogram

 Training(n = 194)

0.87 (0.81–0.93)

0.82

0.83

0.82

0.65

0.91

 Validation (n = 82)

0.90 (0.83–0.96)

0.80

1.00

0.80

1.00

0.73

  1. AUC Area under curve, PPV Positive predictive value, NPV Negative predictive value