Table 3 Safety Analysis after treatment at T0 (screening day)
From: Acceptability and safety of thermal ablation to prevent cervical cancer in sub-Saharan Africa
Side effects | Number | Percent |
|---|---|---|
Severity of bleeding a (n = 234) | ||
Grade 0 | 233 | 99.5 |
Grade 1 | 1 | 0.5 |
Grade 2–4 | 0 | 0 |
Severity of faintness (n = 233) | ||
Grade 0 | 225 | 96.5 |
Grade 1 | 7 | 3 |
Grade 2 | 1 | 0.5 |
Grade 3-4 | 0 | 0 |
Severity of hot flush (n = 234) | ||
Grade 0 | 230 | 98.5 |
Grade 1 | 4 | 1.5 |
Grade 2–4 | 0 | 0 |
Severity of nausea a (n = 234) | ||
Grade 0 | 233 | 99.5 |
Grade 1 | 1 | 0.5 |
Grade 2–4 | 0 | 0 |
Severity of headaches (n = 234) | ||
Grade 0 | 232 | 99.5 |
Grade 1 | 1 | 0.5 |
Grade 2–4 | 0 | 0 |
Comfortable with the treatmentb (n = 234) | ||
Yes | 225 | 97.5 |
No | 6 | 2.5 |