Skip to main content

Table 3 Association between chemoimmunotherapy and overall survival according to histology and sex

From: Modulation of chemoimmunotherapy efficacy in non-small cell lung cancer by sex and histology: a real-world, patient-level analysis

Multivariable Analysis

 

Adenocarcinoma (n = 8256)

Squamous Cell Carcinoma (n = 2263)

 

HRadja (95% CI)

HRadja (95% CI)

Chemoimmunotherapy Yes vs. No, Males

0.82 (0.75–0.90)

0.73 (0.58–0.91)

Chemoimmunotherapy Yes vs. No, Females

0.85 (0.77–0.94)

1.03 (0.76–1.38)

Immunotherapy*Sex

p = 0.6496

p = 0.0710

Propensity Matched Analysisa

 

Adenocarcinoma (n = 2958, 1479 pairs)

Squamous Cell Carcinoma

(n = 276; 138 pairs)

 

HR (95% CI)

HR (95% CI)

Chemoimmunotherapy Yes vs. No, Males

0.79 (0.70–088)

0.86 (0.61–1.21)

Chemoimmunotherapy Yes vs. No, Females

0.85 (0.74–0.96)

0.97 (0.62–1.53)

Immunotherapy*Sex

p = 0.4347

p = 0.6760

  1. aadjusted for/propensity matched on sex, age at diagnosis, histology (adenocarcinoma, squamous, large cell or other), race (white, Black or Asian/other), Charlson-Deyo comorbidity index, receipt of palliative radiation, year of diagnosis, insurance status (uninsured, privately insured, publically insured, unknown), and median household income for patient’s area of residence (< $38,000, $38,000–$47,999, $48,000–$62,999, >$63,000), * interaction effect
  2. Abbreviations: HR Hazard Ratio, CI Confidence Interval