Skip to main content

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of study participants according to different operation group status in unmatched and matched cohorts

From: Comparison of surgical outcomes and prognosis between wedge resection and simple Segmentectomy for GGO diameter between 2 cm and 3 cm in non-small cell lung cancer: a multicenter and propensity score matching analysis

Variables

Full cohort

After propensity score matching

Simple segmentectomy group

(n = 160)

Wedge resection group

(n = 350)

Standardized

Differencea

Simple segmentectomy group

(n = 100)

Wedge resection group

(n = 100)

Standardized

differencea

General data

 Age

55.4(13.5)

62.9(16.2)

0.28

57.2(14.1)

57.7(14.2)

0.002

 Male

95(59.3%)

192(54.8%)

0.91

58(58%)

53(53%)

0.015

 Tumor size(cm)

2.92(0.2)

2.64(0.17)

0.48

2.73(0.19)

2.71(0.19)

0.011

 Solid component size

1.54(0.14)

1.92(0.19)

0.37

1.78(0.17)

1.82(0.18)

0.013

Smoking status

 Ever

77(48.1%)

198(56.5%)

−0.39

47(47%)

49(49%)

0.003

 Margin(mm)

13.2(4.2)

25.7(5.6)

−0.66

19.5(3.6)

22.4(4.1)

0.002

 Median operative time(min)

121.7(25.3)

62.9(14.3)

0.53

110.6(19.5)

71.2(17.9)

0.013

 Blood loss (ml)

210(45.1)

120(21.7)

0.77

150(26.8)

130(24.2)

0.001

 Dissected lymph nodes(n)

6(0.57)

2.5(0.29)

0.55

4(0.34)

1.5(0.31)

0.006

Tumor Site

 RUL

33(20.6%)

81(23.1%)

0.456

21(21%)

19(19%)

0.01

 RML

0

14(4%)

0.65

0

3(3%)

0.018

 RLL

31(19.3%)

97(27.7%)

−0.541

23(23%)

26(26%)

−0.009

 LUL

48(30%)

69(19.7%)

−0.42

37(37%)

33(33%)

0.01

 LLL

48(30%)

89(25.4%)

−0.47

19(19%)

19(19%)

0

Histology

 Adenocarcinoma

142(88.7%)

287(82%)

−0.41

91(91%)

89(89%)

0.01

 AIS

46(28.8%)

98(28%)

−0.33

29(29%)

26(26%)

0.05

 MIA

57(35.6%)

123(35.1%)

−0.51

32(32%)

34(34%)

0.04

 IA

39(24.3%)

66(18.9%)

0.21

30(30%)

29(29%)

−0.012

 Pulmonary function (%)

58.6%(4.9)

53.7%(3.7)

0.35

57.3%(4.5)

54.2%(3.8)

0.05

 Poor pulmonary functionb

34(21.2%)

81(23.1%)

−0.44

21(21%)

24(24%)

0.02

 Ejection fraction (%)

67.1%(5.8)

60.2%(5.1)

0.38

64.6%(5.6)

61.7%(5.1)

0.041

 Poor ejection fractionc

22(13.8%)

31(8.9%)

0.31

16(16%)

13(13%)

0.023

  1. Data are expressed as mean (SD) or number (%). a Standardized differences of 0.2, 0.5 and 0.8 were deemed to represent tiny, medium and huge differences, respectively. These differences do not denote statistical significance
  2. b Poor pulmonary function was defined as an FEV1/FVC ratio of< 50%
  3. c Poor ejection fraction was defined as a left ventricular ejection fraction of< 50%