Skip to main content

Table 4 Multivariate analysis for OS and CSS in training cohort

From: Construction and validation of the prognostic model for patients with neuroendocrine cervical carcinoma: a competing risk nomogram analysis

Cetegory

Overall survival

P

Cancer-specific survival

P

Hazard Ratio (95% CI)

Hazard Ratio (95% CI)

Age(year)

 < 44

Reference

 

Reference

 

 44–67

1.372 (1.051–1.790)

0.019

1.285 (0.964–1.713)

0.086

 > 67

1.738 (1.209–2.498)

0.002

1.659 (1.091–2.524)

0.018

Year at diagnosis

 2004–2009

Reference

 

NI

 

 2010–2015

1.081 (0.864–1.353)

0.492

NI

NI

Marital status

 Married

Reference

 

Reference

 

 Single

1.043 (0.816–1.332)

0.738

1.104 (0.846–1.440)

0.464

 Other

1.207 (0.861–1.691)

0.274

0.916 (0.608–1.381)

0.677

Gradea

 Low

Reference

 

Reference

 

 High

1.749 (0.912–3.356)

0.092

1.501 (0.753–2.989)

0.248

Stage

 I

Reference

 

Reference

 

 II

1.630

0.002

1.545 (1.081–2.209)

0.016

 III

2.256

 < 0.001

2.403 (1.665–3.467)

 < 0.001

 IV

2.760

 < 0.001

2.652 (1.648–4.628)

 < 0.00

Tumor size

 < 2 cm

Reference

 

Reference

 

 2–4 cm

2.487 (1.512–4.092)

 < 0.001

2.127 (1.213–3.732)

0.008

 > 4 cm

3.104 (1.916–5.028)

 < 0.001

2.763 (1.609–4.744)

 < 0.001

Metastasis

 Absent

Reference

 

Reference

 

 Present

2.778 (2.151–3.587)

 < 0.001

3.029 (2.293–4.001)

 < 0.001

Surgery

 Performed

Reference

 

Reference

 

 None

1.173 (0.881–1.561)

0.274

0.955 (0.702–1.298)

0.769

Radiotherapy

 Yes

Reference

 

Reference

 

 No

1.083 (0.831–1.410)

0.556

1.224 (0.910–1.648)

0.180

Chemotherapy

 Yes

Reference

 

Reference

 

 No

1.979 (1.485–2.637)

 < 0.001

1.489 (1.059–2.095)

0.022

  1. CI confidence interval, aLow: Grade I (well differentiated) and Grade II (moderately differentiated); High: Grade III (poorly differentiated) and Grade
  2. IV (undifferentiated anaplastic)