Skip to main content

Table 3 Univariate analysis for OS and CSS in training cohort

From: Construction and validation of the prognostic model for patients with neuroendocrine cervical carcinoma: a competing risk nomogram analysis

Cetegory

Overall survival

Cancer-specific survival

P (Log-rank test)

P (grey's test)

Age(year)

 < 44 vs. 44–67

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

 < 44 vs. > 67

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

Year at diagnosis

 2004–2009 vs. 2010–2015

0.023

0.076

Marital status

 Married vs. Single

0.009

0.012

 Married vs. Other

 < 0.001

0.031

Race

 White vs. Black

0.025

0.034

 White vs. Othera

0.549

0.264

Gradeb

 Low vs. High

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

Stage

 I vs II

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

 I vs III

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

 I vs IV

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

Tumor size

 < 2 cm vs. 2–4 cm

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

 < 2 cm vs. > 4 cm

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

Metastasis

 Absent vs. Present

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

Surgery

 Performed vs. None

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

Radiotherapy

 No

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

Chemotherapy

 Yes vs. No

0.034

 < 0.001

  1. aAmerican Indian/Alaskan Native, Asian/Pacific Islander, bLow: Grade I (well differentiated) and Grade II (moderately differentiated, High: Grade III (poorly differentiated) and Grade IV (undifferentiated anaplastic).
Back to article page

BMC Cancer

ISSN: 1471-2407

Contact us