Table 7 Model 2 Path analysis after adjusting for confounders
From: Mediators of screening uptake in a colorectal cancer screening intervention among Hispanics
| Â | Coefficient (SE)a | p-value |
|---|---|---|
Benefit | ||
 Intervention-education | 2.709 (0.299) | <0.001 |
Barrier | ||
 Intervention-education | 1.792 (0.739) | 0.015 |
 Doctor recommended CRC-yes | −2.031 (1.012) | 0.045 |
 Health status-excellent/good/fair | −1.976 (0.711) | 0.005 |
 Heard of CRC | −3.559 (0.764) | <0.001 |
Fatalism | ||
 Intervention-education | −1.753 (0.294) | <0.001 |
 Age (years) | 0.082 (0.027) | 0.003 |
 Education-HS | −1.548 (0.345) | <0.001 |
 Heard of CRC | −0.827 (0.3) | 0.006 |
Self-Efficacy | ||
 Intervention-education | 11.548 (0.592) | <0.001 |
 Doctor recommended CRC-yes | 2.928 (0.819) | <0.001 |
Susceptibility | ||
 Intervention-education | 0.285 (0.13) | 0.028 |
 Health status-excellent/good/fair | −0.44 (0.128) | 0.001 |
 Family history of cancer | 1.141 (0.312) | <0.001 |
Knowledge | ||
 Intervention-education | 0.445 (0.088) | <0.001 |
Screening uptake | ||
 Intervention-education | 3.698 (0.288) | <0.001 |
 Fatalism | −0.067 (0.031) | 0.033 |
 Knowledge | −0.259 (0.111) | 0.02 |
 Self-efficacy | 0.051 (0.019) | 0.009 |
Intervention-Education | ||
 Doctor recommended CRC-yes | −0.563 (0.261) | 0.031 |
 Education-diploma | 1.121 (0.262) | <0.001 |
 Gender-female | −0.698 (0.253) | 0.006 |
 Health status-excellent/good/fair | −0.487 (0.197) | 0.013 |
 Heard of CRC | −0.85 (0.213) | <0.001 |
 Baseline barrier | 0.063 (0.012) | <0.001 |
 Baseline fatalism | −0.08 (0.027) | 0.004 |
 Baseline knowledge | −0.258 (0.079) | 0.001 |
 Baseline self-efficacy | 0.137 (0.014) | <0.001 |