Skip to main content

Table 4 Model 1 Path analysis after adjusting for confounders

From: Mediators of screening uptake in a colorectal cancer screening intervention among Hispanics

 

Factor loading (SE)a

p-value

Psychosocial health score-construct

 Benefit

1.117 (0.129)

<0.001

 Barrier

0.435 (0.253)

0.085

 Fatalism

−0.681 (0.105)

<0.001

 Self-Efficacy

4.357 (0.44)

<0.001

 Susceptibility

0.219 (0.049)

<0.001

Psychosocial health score-construct

Coefficient (SE)a

 

 Intervention-education

2.44 (0.259)

<0.001

 Health status-excellent/good/fair

−0.271 (0.122)

0.026

 Doctor recommended CRC-yes

0.420 (0.169)

0.013

 Knowledge

0.255 (0.062)

<0.001

Knowledge

 Intervention-education

0.426 (0.087)

<0.001

 Education-diploma

0.251 (0.103)

0.015

Screening uptake

 Psychosocial health score-construct

0.730 (0.237)

0.002

 Intervention-education

−0.375 (0.14)

0.007

 Knowledge

−0.375 (0.14)

 

Intervention-Education

 Doctor recommended CRC-yes

−0.515 (0.259)

0.047

 Education- diploma

1.161 (0.256)

<0.001

 Gender-female

−0.739 (0.25)

0.003

 Health status-excellent/good/fair

−0.461 (0.194)

0.017

 Heard of CRC

−0.864 (0.211)

<0.001

 Baseline barrier

0.064 (0.012)

<0.001

 Baseline fatalism

−0.080 (0.027)

0.003

 Baseline knowledge

−0.269 (0.079)

0.001

 Baseline self-efficacy

0.132 (0.013)

<0.001

  1. Model 1: Path analysis with psychosocial health construct
  2. SE Standard Error, CRC Colorectal Cancer
  3. aUnstandardized regression coefficient