Skip to main content

Table 4 Model 1 Path analysis after adjusting for confounders

From: Mediators of screening uptake in a colorectal cancer screening intervention among Hispanics

  Factor loading (SE)a p-value
Psychosocial health score-construct
 Benefit 1.117 (0.129) <0.001
 Barrier 0.435 (0.253) 0.085
 Fatalism −0.681 (0.105) <0.001
 Self-Efficacy 4.357 (0.44) <0.001
 Susceptibility 0.219 (0.049) <0.001
Psychosocial health score-construct Coefficient (SE)a  
 Intervention-education 2.44 (0.259) <0.001
 Health status-excellent/good/fair −0.271 (0.122) 0.026
 Doctor recommended CRC-yes 0.420 (0.169) 0.013
 Knowledge 0.255 (0.062) <0.001
Knowledge
 Intervention-education 0.426 (0.087) <0.001
 Education-diploma 0.251 (0.103) 0.015
Screening uptake
 Psychosocial health score-construct 0.730 (0.237) 0.002
 Intervention-education −0.375 (0.14) 0.007
 Knowledge −0.375 (0.14)  
Intervention-Education
 Doctor recommended CRC-yes −0.515 (0.259) 0.047
 Education- diploma 1.161 (0.256) <0.001
 Gender-female −0.739 (0.25) 0.003
 Health status-excellent/good/fair −0.461 (0.194) 0.017
 Heard of CRC −0.864 (0.211) <0.001
 Baseline barrier 0.064 (0.012) <0.001
 Baseline fatalism −0.080 (0.027) 0.003
 Baseline knowledge −0.269 (0.079) 0.001
 Baseline self-efficacy 0.132 (0.013) <0.001
  1. Model 1: Path analysis with psychosocial health construct
  2. SE Standard Error, CRC Colorectal Cancer
  3. aUnstandardized regression coefficient