Skip to main content

Table 2 Model 1 Path analysis

From: Mediators of screening uptake in a colorectal cancer screening intervention among Hispanics

  Factor loading (SE)a p-value R2
Latent psychosocial health construct
 Benefit 0.456 (0.0.036) <0.001 0.208
 Barrier 0.143 (0.049) 0.004 0.01
 Fatalism −0.297 (0.040) <0.001 0.088
 Self-Efficacy 0.763 (0.034) <0.001 0.581
 Susceptibility 0.250 (0.041) <0.001 0.063
  Coefficient (SE)b p-value  
Psychosocial health construct score    0.593
 Intervention-education 2.222 (0.202) <0.001  
 Health status-excellent/good/fair −0.307 (0.118) 0.009  
 Doctor recommended CRC-yes 0.335 (0.16) 0.03  
 Knowledge 0.267 (0.046) <0.001  
Knowledge    0.05
 Intervention-education 0.431 (0.087) <0.001  
 Education-diploma 0.288 (0.119) 0.016  
Screening uptake    0.648
 Psychosocial score 0.353 (0.076) <0.001  
 Intervention-education 1.709 (0.237) <0.001  
 Knowledge −0.178 (0.059) 0.003  
Model fit criteria N = 715
  RMSEA = 0.053 (p = 0.305)
  CFI = 0.92
  TLI = 0.88
  1. Model 1: Path analysis with psychosocial health construct
  2. SE Standard Error, CRC Colorectal Cancer, SE Standard Error, R2 Coefficient of Determination, RMSEA Root Mean Square Error of Approximation, CFI Comparative Fit Index, TLI Tucker-Lewis Index
  3. aStandardized coefficient
  4. bUnstandardized regression coefficient