Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of 6 trials included in this meta-analysis

From: Immune checkpoint inhibitors plus neoadjuvant chemotherapy in early triple-negative breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Source

Year

Journal

Phase

Treatment

No. of patients

Median age

Primary endpoints

pCR in ITT(%)

KEYNOTE-522, Schmid et al. [17]

2020

New England Journal of Medicine

3

E:Pembro+pac + Cb → AC

C:pbo + pac + Cb → AC

784

390

49(22–80)

48(24–79)

pCR and EFS in ITT

64.8(260/401)

51.2(103/201)

GeparNuevo study, Loibl et al. [19]

2019

Annals of Oncology

2

E:Durva+nab-pac → EC

C:Pbo + nab-pac → EC

88

86

49.5(23–76)

pCR in ITT

53.4(47/88)

44.2(38/86)

NeoTRIPaPDL1, Gianni et al. [21]

2019

Cancer Research

3

E:Atezo+Cb + nab-pac C: Cb + nab-pac

138

142

50

EFS

43.5(60/138)

40.8(58/142)

I-SPY2 Trial, Nanda et al. [18]

2020

JAMA oncology

2

E:Pembro+pac → AC C:Pbo + pac → AC

29

85

50(27–71)

47(24–77)

pCR in ITT

60(17/28)

22(17/79)

Impassion031, Elizabethet al. [20]

2020

The Lancet

3

E:Atezo+nab-pac → AC

C:Pbo + nab-pac → AC

165

168

51(22–76)

51(26–78)

pCR in ITT and in PD-L1+ populations

57.6(95/165)

41.1(69/168)

Nci 10,013, Foluso et al. [22]

2021

Cancer Research

2

E:Atezo+pac + Cb C:Pac + Cb

45

22

52(25–78)

pCR and TIL percentages in ITT

55.6(25/45)

18.8(3/16)

  1. E Experimental, C Control, pCR pathological complete response, EFS event-free survival, ITT intention-to-treat populations, PD-L1+ programmed death ligand 1 positive