Skip to main content

Table 1 The baseline characteristics of included studies

From: Survival landscape of different tumor regression grades and pathologic complete response in rectal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy based on reconstructed individual patient data

Study

Country&year

Study design

NO. of patients (M/F)

Age mean ± SD/median (range)

Definition of pCR

Different groups of tumor regression

Follow-up median (range)

TNM stage

(0/I/II/III)

Neoadjuvant treatment regimen

Outcome

Erlandsson

Sweden

2019

RCT

697

(416/281)

NR

ypT0N0M0

①②③④⑤

5.7y (IQR, 4.9–14.3y)

yp:42/213/215/201

RT

OS, DFS

Marco

USA

2018

Prospective study

211

(124/87)

NR

No residual tumor cells

â‘ â‘¡

59 m (9–125 m)

yp:65/58/41/47

RT + FU/ RT + FU + mFOLFOX6

OS, DFS

Song

Korea

2018

Retrospective study

331

(229/102)

≤61y: n = 161

>61y: n = 170

No residual tumor cells

①②③④⑤⑥⑦⑧

65.0 m (8.4–159.3 m)

yp:45/94/80/112

RT + CAP/ RT + FU + LV/ RT + cetuximab + irinotecan + capecitabine

OS, DFS

Karagkounis

USA

2018

Post hoc study

305

(224/81)

57.5y(25.9–85.9y)

No residual tumor cells

①②③④⑤⑥⑦⑧

4.9y (range 0.3–15.8y)

yp:−/123/182/−

RT + FU/ RT + CAP

OS

Kuan

China

2017

Retrospective study

1914

(1300/614)

59.97 ± 12.10y: n = 1655

59.59 ± 12.36: n = 259

ypT0N0M0

â‘ â‘¡

37.0 m

c:−/523/1391/−

RT + FU/ LV, tegafur or capecitabine

OS

Fokas

German

2017

RCT

1179

(838/341)

NR

No residual tumor cells

①②⑥⑦⑧

50 m (38–61 m)

NR

RT + FU/ RT + FU + OX

OS, DFS

De Felice

Italy

2016

Prospective study

100

(67/33)

64y (38-76y)

No residual tumor cells

â‘ â‘¡

NR

NR

RT + OX + FU

DFS

Zhang

China

2015

Retrospective study

295

(203/92)

<55y: n = 153

≥55y: n = 142

ypT0N0M0

①②③④⑤⑥⑦⑧

36 m (5–120 m)

yp:77/53/97/68

RT + XELOX/ RT + FOLFOX/ RT + Xeloda

OS, DFS

Fokas

German

2014

RCT

391

(283/108)

≤61y: n = 205

>61y: n = 186

No residual tumor cells

①②⑥⑦⑧

132 m (90–184 m)

NR

RT + FU

DFS

de Campos-Lobato

Brazil

2011

Post hoc study

238

(174/64)

57y (49–67y)

ypT0N0M0

â‘ â‘¡

55 m (IQR, 36–77 m)

NR

RT + 5-FU/ RT + CAP

OS, DFS

Belluco

Italy

2011

Retrospective study

139

(93/46)

62y

No residual tumor cells

â‘ â‘¡

55.4 m

NR

RT + 5-FU + LV/ RT + 5-FU + gefitinib/ RT + CAP/ RT + CAP + OX/ RT + raltitrexed

DFS

Bujko

Poland

2010

RCT

131

(88/43)

TRG 0: 58y (39–72y)

TRG 1: 62y (44–70y)

TRG 2: 59y (41–72y)

TRG 3: 59y (34–73y)

No residual tumor cells

①②③④⑤

4y

NR

RT + FU + LV

DFS

  1. M/F male/female; pCR pathological complete response; RCT randomized control trial; m month; y year; TRG tumor regression grade; IQR interquartile range; ①: pCR group; ②: non-pCR group; ③: near pCR group; ④: good regression group; ⑤: poor regression group; ⑥: major regression group; ⑦: moderate regression group; ⑧:minor regression group; c clinical stage; yp pathologic stage after receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy; RT radiotherapy; FU fluorouracil; mFOLFOX6 fluorouracil + leucovorin + oxaliplatin; FOLFOX fluorouracil + leucovorin + oxaliplatin; LV leucovorin; CAP capecitabine; OX oxaliplatin; XELOX capecitabine + oxaliplatin; OS overall survival; DFS disease-free survival; NR not reported