Skip to main content

Table 1 The characteristics of included studies and involved individuals

From: Association between smokeless tobacco use and oral cavity cancer risk in women compared with men: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Study

Region

Study design

Sample size (case/non-case)

Age (yrs)

Sex (%)

Cases definition

Control definition

Type of smokeless product

Confounders adjusted

Matching of control

Study quality

(NOS score)

Hirayama 1966 [29]

Central and south east Asia

Case-control

291 (173/118)

> 19.0

Male and female

Hospital cases of oral cancer

Non cancer cases from hospital

Pan tobacco, Manpuri, and other (Chew)

Restricted to non smokers

Age and sex

5

Winn 1981 [30]

US

Case-control

643 (233/410)

All stages

Female

Hospital cases of oral cancer

Non cancer cases from hospital

Oral snuff (NonChew)

Analysis of non smokers

Age, race, source of ascertainment, and country

6

Sankaranarayanan 1989a [31]

India

Case-control

681 (228/453)

All stages

Male and female

Histologically confirmed cases of tongue and floor of mouth from HBCR

Two non cancer for each case from hospital

Pan tobacco chewer (Chew)

Restricted to non smoker among man and non smoking non alcoholic among women

Age, sex and religion

7

Sankaranarayanan 1989b [32]

India

Case-control

1082 (187/895)

All stages

Male and female

Cancer Cases of gingiva from PBCR

Non cancer cases from hospital

Pan tobacco/ (Chew) Snuff (Non Chew)

Bidi alcohol and other Tobacco type

Unmatched

5

Nandakumar 1990 [33]

India

Case-control

696 (348/348)

55.0

Male and female

Histologically confirmed cases registered in PBCR for lip, tongue and mouth

Non cancer cases from hospital

Mixed for Tobacco, Pan and snuff (Chew)

Restricted to Non Smoking

Sex, age gp and residential area

6

Sankaranarayanan 1990 [34]

India

Case-control

1309 (414/895)

All stages

Male and female

Cancer Cases of buccal mucosa and labial mucosa registered in Trivandrum HBCR (1983–84)

Non cancer cases from hospital

Pan tobacco/(Chew)

Snuff (Non Chew)

Bidi, alcohol

And other tobacco type

Unmatched

6

Rao 1994 [35]

India

Case-control

1348 (713/635)

47.9

Male

Histologically confirmed oral cancer cases from hospital

Non cancer cases from hospital

Mixed Pan, betel nut, lime tobacco (Chew)

Analysis in non smoker and non alcoholic, stratification for age and residence

Unmatched

6

Lewin 1998 [36]

Sweden

Population based case referral oral cavity

653 (103/550)

40.0–79.0

Male

Incident Case from PBCR

Population based controls

Oral moist snuff (Non Chew)

Age, region, smoking and alcohol

Age group and region

7

Dikshit 2000 [37]

India

Case-control

408 (148/260)

All stages

Male

From PBCR records

Population controls randomly selected

Tobacco quid (Chew)

Age and smoking

Unmatched

6

Balaram 2002 [38]

India

Case-control

1173 (591/582)

18.0–87.0

Male and female

Histologically confirmed cases cases of oral cancer

Non cancer cases from hospital

Pan tobacco (Chew)

Age centre education chewing and (men only) smoking and drinking habits

Frequency matched control by centre quinquennium of age and gender

6

Znaor 2003 [39]

India

Case-control

1879 (281/1598)

≥ 25.0

Male

Histologically confirmed cases cases of oral cancer

Non cancer cases from hospital

Tobacco type not specified (Chew)

Age, centre, education level and smoking and alcohol drinking center

Sex

6

Luo 2007 [40]

Sweden

Retrospective cohort

279,897 (248/279,649)

≥ 35.0

Male

Users of snus From 1969 through 1992

Non users of snus

Swedish moist snuff (snus) (Non Chew)

Smoking

Not applicable

7

Muwonge 2008 [41]

India

Nested case-control

1692 (282/1410)

≥ 35.0

Male and female

Histologically confirmed Case that are newly

Randomly selected five non cancers from screened population

Pan with tobacco (Chew) Areca nut /lime +tobacco (Chew)

Smoking, alcohol education, religion

Sex, age panchayats and response status

7

Jayalekshmi 2009 [42]

India

Prospective cohort

78,140 (92/78,062)

30.0–85.0

Female

Former and current chewer females

Never chewer

Tobacco type not specified (Chew)

Age, family income, alcohol restricted to Non smokers

Not applicable

8

Pednekar 2011 [43]

India

Prospective cohort

87,222 (423/86,799)

≥ 35.0

Male

Male from voter list, cancer free at start. Patients registered in 150 government and private hospitals and institutions

Non user of SLT

Tobacco type not specified (Chew)

Age, education, religion, mother tongue, tobacco and BMI

Not applicable

8

Jayalekshmi 2011 [44]

India

Prospective cohort

66,277 (160/66,117)

30.0–84.0

Male

Former and current chewer females

Never chewer

Tobacco type not specified (Chew)

Age, calendar time, income and education

Not applicable

8

Ray 2013 [45]

India

Case-control

1250 (484/766)

10.0–99.0

Male and female

Histologically confirmed cases of oral cancer

Non cancer cases from hospital

(Betal + gudhaka) (Chew) Oral Snuff (Non Chew)

Restricted to Non Smokers and Non alcoholic

Area of residence

6

Arain 2015 [46]

Pakistan

Case-control

7556 (1401/6155)

30.0–60.0

Male and female

Histologically confirmed cases of oral cancer

Non cancer cases from hospital

Gutkha (Chew) NasalSnuff/(NonChew) Manipuri (Chew)

Smoking and Alcohol Other smokeless tobacco products (Restricted to non smoking and non alcoholic)

Age group, socio economic status and dietary habits

6

Khan 2017 [47]

Pakistan

Case-control

258 (84/174)

57.0

Male and female

Histologically confirmed cases of oral cancer

Non cancer cases from hospital

Naswar (Non Chew)

Age, sex, and MAS variables

Age, and sex

5

  1. Abbreviations: NOS Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, SLT smokeless tobacco, MAS minimum Adjustment Set