Author | Work outcomes | Other outcomes | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sick Leave / RTW (Y/N) | Working hours | Other: | Physical | Psychological | QoL | Other | |
Björneklett et al. (2013) | (Sick Leave - Days): No significant differences at 0, 2, 6, or 12 months. |  |  |  |  |  | Healthcare utilisation: Not significant re. visits to medical specialists, GPs or physiotherapists. However, women treated with chemotherapy in intervention group had significantly more visits with ‘Other’ healthcare professionals than the control at 6 and 12 months. Health economics: Intervention was significantly greater in cost compared to control. |
Bolam et al. (2019) | % of sick leave at that timepoint: No significant differences between the two groups at 2 years. |  |  | Cancer-related fatigue (CRF): Significant differences between RT-HIIT and control groups for CRF and Cognitive CRF in favour of RT-HIIT who experienced improvements in both. Physical symptoms (Item MSAS): No significant differences | Psychological symptoms (Item of MSAS): No significant differences between groups. Emotional functioning (item of EORTC): No significant differences | QoL: No significant differences between the two groups. | Total symptoms: Sig. ↓ total symptoms than UC at 2 years in favour of AT-HIIT intervention. Symptom burden: Sig. ↓ symptom burden than UC at 2 years in favour of AT-HIIT intervention. |
Hubbard et al. (2013) | Number of days sick leave: No significant differences | Â | Change in employment pattern: No significant differences between groups | Fatigue: No significant differences Physical functioning (item of FACT-B): No significant differences | Emotional functioning (item of FACT-B): No significant differences | QoL: Significant differences between groups on breast cancer specific QoL in favour of intervention who experienced improvements. | Â |
QoL: Quality of Life; RT-HIIT = Resistance Exercise and High-Intensity Interval Training; AT-HIIT = Moderate Intensity Aerobic Exercise and High-Intensity Interval Training | |||||||
Author | Work outcomes | Other outcomes | |||||
Sick Leave / RTW (Y/N) | Working hours | Other: | Physical | Psychological | QoL | Other: | |
Ibrahim et al. (2017) | Â | Not reported for control group therefore unable to ascertain if significant. | Â | Upper limb function: No significant differences | Â | Â | Â |
Jong et al. (2018) | Return to work (Y/N): No significant difference between groups |  |  | Fatigue: No significant differences Confidence in fatigue reduction: Significantly more confident in fatigue reduction in favour of intervention group. Adequate relief of fatigue (Y/N): Significantly more relief of fatigue in favour of intervention group. | Psychological distress: No significant differences in levels of anxiety Significantly less depressive symptoms at 3 months in favour of intervention. Emotional functioning (item of EORTC): No significant differences | QoL: Significantly less nausea and vomiting at six months in favour of Intervention group. No significant differences for other outcomes. | Impact of events: No significant differences. Treatment expectations: Intervention group had significantly higher treatment expectations compared to control. |
Maguire et al. (1983) | RTW (Y/N): No significant differences | Â | Â | Upper limb swelling, pain and disability No significant differences | Reaction to scar, prosthesis and breast loss: Intervention group were significantly more satisfied with scar, prothesis, breast loss, compared to control. | Â | Housework, Social adjustment, Martial adjustment: No significant differences between groups. |
QoL: Quality of Life; RT-HIIT = Resistance Exercise and High-Intensity Interval Training; AT-HIIT = Moderate Intensity Aerobic Exercise and High-Intensity Interval Training | |||||||
Work outcomes | Other outcomes | ||||||
Author | Sick Leave / RTW (Y/N) | Working hours | Other: | Physical | Psychological | QoL | Other: |
Maunsell et al. (1996) | RTW (Y/N): No significant differences | Working hours (per week): No significant differences | Â | Physical health: No significant differences | Psychological distress: No significant differences | Â | Perception of health. Functional status, Social activity, Marital relations: No significant differences |
Mourgues et al. (2014) |  |  | Occupational activity (Work): Significant improvement in ability to perform work activities at 12 months in favour of intervention group. |  |  |  | Overall activities: Significant differences between groups in favour of intervention who had increased resumption of overall activities in first 12-month period. Non- occupational activity (Family, household tasks and volunteerism): Significant improvement in ability to perform family activities at 12 months, in favour of intervention. Cost-effectiveness: Significant differences at 12 months, in favour of intervention |
Rogers et al. (2009) | Number of sick days in past month: No significant differences | Â | Â | Fatigue, Joint pain, Physical function: No significant differences Physical functioning (item of FACT-B): No significant differences Joint stiffness: Significantly greater perceived joint stiffness in intervention group compared to control. | Emotional functioning (item of FACT-B): No significant differences | QoL: Significant improvement in social well-being in favour of intervention Not significant for other QoL outcomes | Cognition, Perceived health, Endocrine symptoms, Sleep dysfunction: No significant differences |