Skip to main content

Table 3 Univariate/multivariate Cox-regression analysis for real-world progression-free survival

From: Real-world effectiveness of post-trastuzumab emtansine treatment in patients with HER2-positive, unresectable and/or metastatic breast cancer: a retrospective observational study (KBCSG-TR 1917)

 

Univariate

(N = 128)

Multivariatea

(N = 126)

HRb

95% CI

p value

HRb

95% CI

p value

Age (years)

  ≥ 60 vs < 60

0.70

0.478–1.024

0.066

ECOG PS

 Unknown vs 0

1.22

0.748–1.991

0.425

0.95

0.555–1.621

0.848

  ≥ 1 vs 0

1.81

1.161–2.824

0.009

1.81

1.158–2.843

0.009

Recurrent / de novo, recurrent vs de novo

0.68

0.461–1.017

0.061

0.64

0.423–0.968

0.034

CNS metastasis, yes vs no

1.02

0.577–1.790

0.956

Visceral metastasis, yes vs no

1.08

0.715–1.623

0.724

Hormone receptor status, positive vs negative

0.97

0.650–1.449

0.883

HER2 status, IHC 3+ vs IHC 2+/ISH + or IHC unknown/ISH+

0.60

0.374–0.961

0.034

0.52

0.307–0.864

0.012

Number of treatment lines before T-DM1 treatment, ≥ 2 vs < 2

1.01

0.688–1.491

0.949

History of pertuzumab treatment, yes vs no

1.55

1.054–2.286

0.026

1.28

0.855–1.903

0.232

History of lapatinib treatment, yes vs no

0.94

0.620–1.439

0.789

Regimen with anthracyclines and/or taxanes before T-DM1

 Yes (both) vs no (both)

1.38

0.784–2.421

0.265

 Yes (either one) vs no (both)

1.57

0.876–2.810

0.130

Best response during T-DM1 treatment

 CR or PR vs SD, non-CR/non-PD, PD, or unknown

0.70

0.468–1.040

0.077

Duration of T-DM1 treatment

  ≥ 12 months vs < 6 months

0.57

0.339–0.959

0.034

0.55

0.318–0.959

0.035

 6–12 months vs < 6 months

0.60

0.377–0.940

0.026

0.65

0.401–1.064

0.087

Duration from the last day of T-DM1 to the start of the next regimen

  ≥ 2 months vs < 1 month

0.71

0.405–1.245

0.233

 1–2 months vs < 1 month

1.28

0.843–1.942

0.247

Regimens after T-DM1

 Anti-HER2 therapy vs without anti-HER2 therapy

0.50

0.305–0.814

0.005

0.48

0.282–0.826

0.008

  1. aStepwise method was applied after forcibly inserting “History of pertuzumab treatment” and “regimens after T-DM1”
  2. bHR with reference to the second comparator
  3. CNS central nervous system, CI confidence interval, CR complete response, ECOG PS Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status, HER2 human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, HR hazard ratio, IHC immunohistochemistry, ISH in situ hybridization, PD progressive disease, PR partial response, SD stable disease, T-DM1 trastuzumab emtansine