Author / year / Country | Study settings | Patient characteristics / Number of patients included in analysis | Gene of cytochrome P450 genotyped and examined | Comparator | Outcomes measured | Methods of symptom assessment | Major findings relevant to review |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Argalacsova et al., 2017 [25]; Czech Republic | Oncology department of a local university | Localised and advanced breast cancer patients undergoing tamoxifen therapy (N = 258) | CYP2D6 | • CYP2D6 metabolic activity classes | • Occurrence of gynaecological adverse events including hot flashes • Time to appearance of adverse events including hot flashes | • Not specified | Comparison between CYP2D6 metabolic activity classes • No significant difference was reported in the occurrence of gynaecological adverse events nor time to appearance of such events between UMs, EMs, IMs and PMs. (p value not reported) |
Baxter et al., 2014 [26]; Canada | Personalised medicine tamoxifen clinic at a local university hospital | Breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant tamoxifen therapy (N = 132) | CYP3A4 CYP2D6 | • CYP2D6 metabolic activity classes • CYP3A4 SNPs | • Hot flashes severity | • Hot flash severity survey | Comparison between CYP2D6 metabolic activity classes • Genotypes of CYP2D6 that affect its metabolic activity have no correlation with hot flash severity (p = 0.76), after adjusting for the factor of concurrent intake of CYP2D6 inhibitory medications and tamoxifen. • However, without such adjustment, IM had significantly lower hot flash severity compared to EM (p < 0.01) The CYP3A4*22 SNP • Compared to patients bearing the CYP3A4 wt allele, those having the CYP3A4*22 SNP are almost 9 times more likely to have zero hot flash severity scores (OR: 8.87, 95% CI; 1.78–44.14, p < 0.01) • By comparing the two groups of patients (patients with wt CYP3A4 vs patients with CYP3A4*22 SNP) who have similar endoxifen levels, patients with CYP3A4*22 SNP are 13 times more likely to have zero hot flash severity score (OR: 13.0, p = 0.0174) |
Dezentjé et al. 2014 [27]; The Netherlands | Not specified in article | Early breast cancer patients, patients to be treated with tamoxifen (N = 742) | CYP2D6 CYP2C9 CYP2C19 CYP2B6 CYP3A5 | • SNPs of CYP2D6, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2B6 and CYP3A5 • CYP2D6 metabolic activity classes | • Hot flashes occurrence • Time to the first occurrence of hot flashes | • Adverse events case report forms | Association between CYP SNPs and hot flashes outcomes • None of the CYP SNPs investigated (CYP2D6*3/*4/*6/*14/*41; CYP2C9*2/*3; CYP2C19*2/*17; CYP2B6*6/*6; CYP3A5*3) showed association with occurrence of hot flashes nor time to the first occurrence of hot flashes (p ≥ 0.17) Comparison between CYP2D6 metabolic activity classes • PMs appeared to be more likely to experience no hot flashes compared to IMs and EMs, but the difference in such likeliness between groups did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.78) |
Fox et al., 2016 [28]; Australia | Not specified in article | Hormone receptor-positive breast cancer patients undergoing tamoxifen therapy (N = 122) | CYP2D6 | • CYP2D6 metabolic activity classes | • Hot flashes frequency • Hot flashes severity | • Hot flashes diaries | Comparison between CYP2D6 metabolic activity classes • Genotypes of CYP2D6 that affect its metabolic activity have no correlation with hot flash occurrence and severity (data not provided) |
Goetz et al., 2005 [29]; USA | Mayo Clinic and North Central Cancer Treatment Group sites | Oestrogen receptor- positive breast cancer patients. Patients to be treated with tamoxifen followed by fluoxymesterone (N = 223) | CYP2D6 CYP3A5 | • CYP2D6 SNPs and genotypes • CYP3A5 SNPs and genotypes | • Hot flashes severity | • Patient-reported severity of hot flashes, and graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria (version 1) | The CYP3A5*3 SNP (6986 G > A) • No significant difference in the proportion of patients bearing the various genotypes of this variant in developing moderate or severe hot flashes (p value not reported) o homozygous G/G: 21% o heterozygous G/A: 25% o homozygous A/A: 17% • CYP3A5 SNPs have no association with severity of hot flashes among patients. Genotype of the CYP2D6*4 SNP (1846 G > A) • There is a tendency for a significantly higher proportion of patients bearing the homozygous wt and heterozygous genotype of this variant in developing moderate or severe hot flashes than those bearing the homozygous *4 allele. However, the difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.06). o homozygous wt/wt: 20% o heterozygous *4/wt: 23% o homozygous *4/*4: 0% |
Henry et al., 2009 [30]; USA | Not specified in article | Breast cancer patients starting tamoxifen treatment (N = 297) | CYP2D6 | • CYP2D6 metabolic activity classes | • Hot flashes frequency • Hot flashes severity | • Hot flashes diaries | Comparison between CYP2D6 metabolic activity classes after 4 months of tamoxifen therapy • Significantly higher mean weekly hot flash score (indicating hot flash severity and frequency) was reported among IMs (44.3 ± 10.2), compared to EMs (26.9 ± 8.8, p = 0.011) and PMs (20.6 ± 16.9, p = 0.038). • EMs (p = 0.100) and PMs (p = 0.089) tend to have a higher likeliness in experiencing no hot flashes compared to IMs. Difference in such likeliness did not reach statistical significance. • Proportion of PMs having severe or very severe hot flashes tends to be less than that of EMs and IMs (9.5% vs 29.8%, p = 0.062) • Significantly higher hot flash frequency was also reported among IMs, compared to EMs and PMs (data and p value not reported) |
Jager et al., 2013 [31]; The Netherlands | Local cancer institute | Breast cancer patients undergoing tamoxifen therapy (N = 109) | CYP2D6 | • CYP2D6 metabolic activity classes | • Hot flashes frequency • Hot flashes severity | • Hot flashes diaries | Comparison between CYP2D6 metabolic activity classes • There were no significant difference in hot flash frequency (p = 0.61) nor hot flash severity (p = 0.99) between EMs, IMs and PMs. |
Jansen et al., 2018 [32]; Canada | Personalised medicine tamoxifen clinic at a local health sciences centre | Breast cancer patients undergoing tamoxifen therapy (N = 410) | CYP2D6 CYP3A4 | • SNPs of CYP3A4 • CYP2D6 metabolic activity classes | • Hot flashes severity | • Hot flashes surveys – Patient-reported occurrence of severe hot flashes based on 7-day recall | Comparison between CYP2D6 metabolic activity classes • Compared to EMs, no significant differences were observed on the level of hot flashes severity among UMs (p = 0.315), IMs (p = 0.681) and PMs (p = 0.822). The CYP3A4*22 SNP • The CYP3A4*22 SNP has no effect on hot flashes severity among patients (p = 0.762). No association between CYP3A4*22 SNP and hot flashes severity was observed. |
Joffe et al., 2012 [33]; USA | Not specified in article | Breast cancer patients starting adjuvant endocrine therapy (N = 18) | CYP2D6 | • CYP2D6 metabolic activity classes | • Occurrence of hot flashes | • Hot flashes diaries • Skin-conductance monitor | Comparison between CYP2D6 metabolic activity classes • No significant difference in the proportion of patients having hot flashes induced by adjuvant endocrine therapy between the EM group and IM group (p value not reported). |
Johansson et al., 2016 [34]; Multi-country collaboration | Not specified in article | Oestrogen receptor and/or progesterone receptor- positive early breast cancer patients before starting adjuvant therapy (N = 1967) | CYP19A1 | • CYP19A1 SNPs | • Occurrence / Severity of hot flashes, sweating, myalgia, joint pain and joint stiffness | • Patient-reported severity of symptoms, and graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.0 | Association with hot flashes The rs10046 (C > T) SNP of CYP19A1 • A significant reduction in the odds of having early-onset severe hot flashes and sweating among patients bearing the homozygous T/T genotype for this SNP, compared to those bearing the homozygous wt and heterozygous genotype. (OR = 0.78, 95% CI 0.63–0.97; p = 0.03) • After adjusting for confounders, reduction of such odds was still observed, but the difference did not reach statistical significance (OR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.66–1.04; p = 0.10) The rs4646 (G > T) SNP of CYP19A1 • No significant correlation between this SNP and odds of occurrence of severe hot flashes and sweating, after adjusting for confounders (OR = 1.08, 95% CI 0.93–1.25; p = 0.30) Association with musculoskeletal symptoms The rs10046 (C > T) SNP of CYP19A1 • No significant correlation between this SNP and odds of occurrence of severe musculoskeletal symptoms, after adjusting for confounders (OR = 0.84, 95% CI 0.65–1.09; p = 0.18) The rs4646 (G > T) SNP of CYP19A1 • No significant correlation between this SNP and odds of occurrence of severe musculoskeletal symptoms, after adjusting for confounders (OR = 1.11, 95% CI 0.93–1.31; p = 0.25) |
Regan et al., 2012 [35]; Multi-country collaboration | Not specified in article | Oestrogen receptor and/or progesterone receptor- positive breast cancer patients. Patients to be treated with tamoxifen and/or letrozole (N = 4393) | CYP2D6 | • CYP2D6 metabolic activity classes | • Occurrence and severity of hot flashes or night sweats | • Patient-reported occurrence of hot flashes on case report forms, and severity was graded according to the Common Toxicity Criteria (version 2.0 | Among patients receiving tamoxifen who did not undergo chemotherapy previously • Genotypes of CYP2D6 that affect its metabolic activity are associated with the occurrence of hot flashes/night sweats (p = 0.02) • PMs and IMs are more likely to have hot flashes/night sweats than EMs. • Hazard ratios of developing hot flashes/night sweats: o PM vs EM: 1.24 (95% CI: 0.96–1.59) o IM vs EM: 1.23 (95% CI: 1.05–1.43) Among patients receiving tamoxifen who underwent chemotherapy previously • No association between CYP2D6 genotypes that affect its metabolic activity and hot flashes/night sweats occurrence (p = 0.81) • Hazard ratios of developing hot flashes/night sweats: o PM vs EM: 0.85 (95% CI: 0.47–1.54) o IM vs EM: 1.05 (95% CI: 0.76–1.45) Among patients receiving letrozole who did not undergo chemotherapy previously • No association between CYP2D6 genotypes that affect its metabolic activity and hot flashes/night sweats occurrence (p = 0.72) • Hazard ratios of developing hot flashes/night sweats: o PM vs EM: 1.10 (95% CI: 0.85–1.44) o IM vs EM: 0.99 (95% CI: 0.83–1.17) Among patients receiving letrozole who underwent chemotherapy previously • PMs and IMs tend to be more likely to develop hot flashes/night sweats than EMs. (p = 0.06) • Hazard ratios of developing hot flashes/night sweats: o PM vs EM: 1.94 (95% CI: 1.12–3.35) o IM vs EM: 1.16 (95% CI: 0.81–1.64) |
Ruddy et al., 2013 [36]; USA | Oncology centre at a local cancer institute | Stage I-III breast cancer patients undergoing tamoxifen therapy (N = 99) | CYP2D6 | • CYP2D6 metabolic activity classes (including a rare allele (RA) class – individuals in this class have an EM phenotype) | • Occurrence of hot flashes • Level of bother caused by hot flashes | • Questionnaire developed based on the Breast Cancer Prevention Trial scale of menopausal symptoms | Comparison between CYP2D6 metabolic activity classes • The proportion of patients having developed hot flashes is similar between the UM/EM/RA group and IM group. (67% vs 69%) • The proportion of patients expressing that they are at least slightly bothered by hot flashes is similar between the UM/EM/RA group and IM group (63% vs 69%) • The proportion of patients expressing that they are at least moderately bothered by hot flashes is similar between the UM/EM/RA group and IM group (34% vs 38%) |
Wickramage et al., 2017 [37]; Sri Lanka | Hospital clinic at the National Cancer Institute in Sri Lanka | Breast cancer patients undergoing tamoxifen treatment (N = 24) | CYP2D6 | • SNPs of CYP2D6 | • Occurrence of hot flashes | • Occurrence of hot flashes reported in clinical records | The CYP2D6*4 SNP (1846 G > A) • The existence of the CYP2D6*4 SNP in patients was not associated with the occurrence of hot flashes among them (p = 0.437) The CYP2D6*41 SNP (Combination of 2988 G > A, 2850 C > T and -1584C) • The existence of the CYP2D6*41 SNP in patients was not associated with the occurrence of hot flashes among them (p = 0.271) |
Zembutsu et al., 2017 [38]; Japan and Singapore | Multi-sites; Hospitals, cancer centres and cancer institutes in Japan and Singapore | Oestrogen receptor -positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative, invasive breast cancer patients undergoing tamoxifen therapy (N = 279) | CYP2D6 | • SNPs/Genotypes of CYP2D6 | • Occurrence of hot flashes | • Not specified | • There was no significant difference in hot flashes occurrence between patients bearing the wt CYP2D6 and those having the CYP2D6 SNPs/genotypes investigated in this study (p = 0.25) |