Skip to main content

Table 3 Associations of SOAT1 SNPs with risk of HBV-HCC

From: Impacts of the SOAT1 genetic variants and protein expression on HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma

 

Case

(n = 221)

Control

(n = 229)

P value

OR(95% CI)

P value

OR(95% CI)

P value

OR(95% CI)

rs10753191

 CC

94 (42.5%)

81 (35.4%)

Ref.

/

Ref.

/

Ref.

/

 CT

97 (43.9%)

118 (51.5%)

0.103

0.708 (0.475–1.057)

0.107

0.716 (0.477–1.075)

0.035

0.564 (0.331–0.960)

 TT

30 (13.6%)

30 (13.1%)

0.655

0.862 (0.479–1.550)

0.547

0.833 (0.460–1.508)

0.483

0.747 (0.331–1.689)

 Dominant

/

/

0.123

0.739 (0.506–1.081)

0.123

0.739 (0.504–1.085)

0.040

0.583 (0.508–2.177)

 Recessive

/

/

0.891

1.042 (0.605–1.794)

0.965

1.012 (0.586–1.749)

0.893

1.051 (0.508–2.177)

 Additive

/

/

0.237

0.840 (0.634–1.122)

0.277

0.858 (0.651–1.131)

0.156

0.764 (0.526–1.108)

rs13306731

 AA

107 (48.4%)

106 (46.3%)

Ref.

/

Ref.

/

Ref.

/

 AG

95 (43.0%)

106 (46.3%)

0.557

0.888 (0.604–1.306)

0.626

0.908 (0.614–1.341)

0.496

0.837 (0.502–1.397)

 GG

19 (8.6%)

17 (7.4%)

0.858

1.107 (0.546–2.246)

0.865

1.064 (0.519–2.185)

0.687

1.207 (0.483–3.020)

 Dominant

/

/

0.706

0.918 (0.634–1.330)

0.714

0.932 (0.642–1.355)

0.613

0.881 (0.538–1.442)

 Recessive

/

/

0.729

1.173 (0.593–2.320)

0.706

1.141 (0.574–2.268)

0.558

1.299 (0.541–3.122)

 Additive

/

/

0.750

0.963 (0.513–1.563)

0.898

0.981 (0.731–1.317)

0.892

0.974 (0.663–1.430)

  1. Adjusted by age, gender
  2. Adjusted by age, gender, HDL, LDL, TC and TG
  3. Dominant model: CC vs. CT + TT for rs10753191; AA vs. AG + GG for rs13306731
  4. Recessive model: TT vs. CC + CT for rs10753191; GG vs. AA+AG for rs13306731
  5. Additive model: CC vs. CT vs. TT for rs10753191; GG vs. AA vs. AG vs. GG for rs13306731