Table 5 Synthesis of implementation outcomes and study classification across included studies

Beidas 2014 [56]

X

X

X

X

Bjerre 2018 [45]

X

X

X

X

X

Bjerre 2019 [57]

X

X

Bultijnck 2018 [58]

X

X

Brown 2019 [46]

X

X

X

Cheifetz 2014 [47]

X

X

X

Cheifetz 2015 [59]

X

X

Culos-Reed 2018 [48]

X

X

X

X

X

Culos-Reed 2019 [60]

X

X

Dalzell 2017 [61]

X

X

X

Dennett 2017

X

X

Dolan 2018 [62]

X

X

X

Haas 2011 [63]

X

X

X

X

Haas 2012 [64]

X

X

X

Heston 2015 [65]

X

X

X

X

X

Irwin 2017 [49]

X

X

X

Kimmel 2014

X

X

X

Kirkham 2016 [66]

X

X

X

Kirkham 2018 [67]

X

X

X

X

X

X

Kirkham 2019 [68]

X

X

Leach 2014 [69]

X

X

Leach 2015 [70]

X

X

X

Leach 2016 [71]

X

X

Mackenzie 2013 [51]

X

X

X

Marker 2018 [72]

X

X

X

Muraca 2011 [73]

X

X

Noble 2012 [52]

X

X

Rajotte 2012 [53]

X

X

X

Rogers 2019 [74]

X

X

X

X

Santa Mina 2012 [75]

X

X

X

Santa Mina 2017 [54]

X

X

X

Santa Mina 2019 [76]

X

X

X

X

Sherman 2010 [77]

X

X

X

X

Speed-Andrews 2012 [78]

X

X

Swenson 2014 [79]

X

X

VanGerpen 2013 [80]

X

X

Wurz 2013 [55]

X

X

TOTAL (n = 37)

6 (16.2%)

14 (37.8%)

13 (35.1%)

12 (32.4%)

21 (56.8%)

6 (16.2%)

1 (2.7%)

1 (2.7%)

18 (48.6%)

12 (32.4%)

7 (18.9%)

TOTAL (unique programs) (n = 31)

6 (19.4%)

14 (45.2%)

11 (35.5%)

11 (35.5%)

17 (54.8%)

6 (19.4%)

1 (3.2%)

1 (3.2%)

15 (48.4%)

11 (35.5%)

6 (19.4%)