Skip to main content

Table 1 Patients data

From: Metabolic alterations in meningioma reflect the clinical course

Parameter

Cluster 1

N = 15

Cluster 2

N = 28

Significance level (p)

Sex (N,%)

 Male (N = 10)

2 (14.2%)

8 (28.5%)

0.45****

 Female (N = 33)

13 (86.6%)

20 (71.4%)

 

Age (mean, SD)

62.3 ± 13.1

64.4 ± 12.8

0.62*

Size (cm3) (mean, SD)

48.3 ± 51.8

88.6 ± 103.3

0.09*

Peritumoral edema (N, %)

 high

4(26.6%)

18(64.3%)

0.02***

 low

11(73.4%)

10(35.7%)

 

Location (N, %)

 falx

3(20%)

3(10.7%)

0.64****

 convexity

2(13.3%)

10(35.7%)

0.16****

 frontobasal

4(26.6%)

5(17.8%)

0.69****

 sphenoid wing

2(13.3%)

4(14.2%)

1***

 petroclival

1(6.6%)

1(3.5%)

1****

 spinal

2(13.3%)

1(3.5%)

0.11****

 others

1(6.6%)

4(14.2%)

0.64****

Simpson grade (N, %)

 Grade 1

5(33.3%)

7(25%)

0.74****

 Grade 2

9(60%)

16(57.1%)

1***

 Grade 3

0(0%)

3(10.7%)

0.54****

 Grade 4

1(6.6%)

2(7.1%)

1****

Preoperative KPS (median, 95% CI)

80% CI(70–80%)

70% CI(%60–80%)

0.01**

Postoperative KPS (median, 95% CI)

90% CI(80–90%)

70% CI(50–90%)

0.007**

Proliferation index (N, %)

 MIB1 < 5%

15(100%)

9(32.1%)

0.01****

 MIB1 > 5%

0(0%)

19(67.9%)

 

Pathology (N, %)

 WHO grade I

15(100%)

13(46.4%)

0.001****

 WHO grade II + III

0(0%)

15(53.6%)

 
  1. SD standard deviation
  2. CI confidence interval
  3. KPS Karnofsky score
  4. * T-test
  5. **Wilcoxon test
  6. ***Chi-squared test
  7. ****Fisher’s exact test