Skip to main content

Table 2 Overview of 1st- and 2nd-line treatments during the study period, mRCC patients, Estonia 2004–2012

From: Changes in therapy and survival of metastatic renal cell carcinoma in Estonia

 

2004–2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2008–2012

2004–2012

First line treatment

137

26

50

47

58

62

243

380

Immunotherapy INFa (%)

137 (100)

24 (92)

24 (48)

2 (4)

2 (3)

1 (2)

53 (22)

207 (55)

Targeted therapy (%)

0 (0)

2 (8)

26 (52)

45 (96)

56 (97)

61 (98)

190 (78)

190 (50)

INFa+Bevacizumab

0

1

7

17

14

12

51

51 (13)

Sunitinib

0

0

16

26

38

42

122

122 (32)

Sorafenib

0

1

1

1

2

0

5

5 (1)

Temsirolimus

0

0

2

1

2

4

9

9 (2)

Pazopanib

0

0

0

0

0

3

3

3 (1)

Second line treatment

4

15

21

23

24

18

101

105

Immunotherapy INFa (%)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

0 (0)

1 (6)

1 (1)

1 (1)

Targeted therapy (%)

4 (100)

15 (100)

21 (100)

23 (100)

24 (100)

17 (94)

100 (99)

104 (99)

INFa+Bevacizumab

0

0

0

1

2

4

7

7 (7)

Sunitinib

0

0

2

3

7

1

13

13 (12)

Sorafenib

2

15

18

17

12

12

74

76 (72)

Temsirolimus

0

0

1

2

1

0

4

4 (4)

Pazopanib

2

0

0

0

0

0

0

2 (2)

Everolimus

0

0

0

0

2

0

2

2 (2)