Skip to main content

Table 2 Evaluation of bias and heterogeneity in 36 associations of coffee intake with cancer incidence

From: Coffee drinking and cancer risk: an umbrella review of meta-analyses of observational studies

Author, year

Cancer type

Unit of comparison

I2 (95%CI)

P for Q*

Eggerā€™s P value

Observeda

Expecteda

P for TESb

Thomopoulos, 2015 [20]

Acute lymphocytic leukemia

H/L

8 (0, 73)

0.368

0.309

2

1.24

ā€“

Thomopoulos, 2015 [20]

Acute myelogenous leukemia

H/L

63 (2, 86)

0.029

0.9

1

1.16

0.444

Godos, 2017 [4]

Biliary tract cancer

H/L

0 (0, 79)

0.849

0.073

0

0.42

ā€“

Wu, 2015 [24]

Bladder cancer

H/L

42 (11, 63)

0.009

0.014

9

10.42

ā€“

Jiang, 2013 [9]

Breast cancer

H/L

0 (0, 39)

0.485

0.374

4

5.64

ā€“

Gan, 2017 [3]

Colon cancer

H/L

30 (0, 62)

0.124

0.699

3

3.14

ā€“

Li, 2013 [13]

Colorectal cancer

H/L

57 (38, 70)

<ā€‰0.001

0.419

11

10.27

ā€“

Lukic, 2018 [8]

Endometrial cancer

H/L

29 (0, 60)

0.132

0.326

8

3.17

0.786

Zheng, 2013 [28]

Esophageal cancer

H/L

42 (0, 69)

0.049

0.038

3

4.88

0.008

Botelho, 2006 [1]

Gastric cancer

H/L

34 (0, 61)

0.055

0.695

3

5.13

ā€“

Malerba, 2013 [15]

Glioma

H/L

0 (0, 75)

0.479

0.135

0

0.85

ā€“

Wijarnpreecha, 2017 [23]

Kidney cancer

H/L

35 (0, 62)

0.052

0.882

2

8.51

ā€“

Ouyang, 2014 [16]

Laryngeal cancer

H/L

76 (53, 88)

<ā€‰0.001

0.329

2

2.83

ā€“

Thomopoulos, 2015 [20]

Leukemia

H/L

55 (0, 82)

0.048

0.128

2

2.34

ā€“

Sang, 2013 [17]

Liver cancer

H/L

10 (0, 47)

0.337

0.05

7

4.24

0.118

Galarraga, 2016 [2]

Lung cancer

H/L

88 (84, 92)

<ā€‰0.001

0.104

9

9.29

ā€“

Han, 2016 [6]

Lymphoma

H/L

68 (30, 86)

0.004

0.775

2

2.32

ā€“

Yew, 2016 [27]

Melanoma

H/L

46 (0, 73)

0.048

0.824

5

2.7

0.107

Vaseghi, 2016 [22]

Nonmelanoma

H/L

29 (0, 71)

0.22

0.512

1

1.28

ā€“

Li, 2016 [11]

Oral cancer

H/L

53 (16, 74)

0.008

0.685

7

4.89

0.245

Miranda, 2017 [15]

Oral/Pharyngeal cancer

H/L

50 (13, 72)

0.009

0.287

6

4.86

0.537

Steevens, 2007 [18]

Ovarian cancer

H/L

51 (11, 73)

0.012

0.047

3

4.57

ā€“

Turati, 2012 [21]

Pancreatic cancer

H/L

50 (32, 64)

<ā€‰0.001

0.876

12

14.86

ā€“

Xia, 2017 [26]

Prostate cancer

H/L

52 (32, 71)

0.001

0.229

4

6.63

ā€“

Gan, 2017 [3]

Rectal cancer

H/L

13 (0, 51)

0.308

0.822

1

3.13

ā€“

Han, 2017 [5]

Thyroid cancer

H/L

0 (0, 71)

0.591

0.746

0

1

ā€“

Li, 2013 [12]

Breast cancer

Per 1 cup

0 (0, 45)

0.796

0.619

0

3.30

ā€“

Gan, 2017 [3]

Colon cancer

Per 1 cup

23 (0, 58)

0.203

0.818

3

3.00

0.999

Gan, 2017 [3]

Colorectal cancer

Per 1 cup

34 (0, 63)

0.081

0.434

3

4.80

ā€“

Huang, 2013 [7]

Endometrial cancer

Per 1 cup

35 (0, 73)

0.161

0.274

3

1.30

0.098

Xie, 2014 [26]

Gastric cancer

Per 1 cup

48 (0, 76)

0.051

0.198

1

2.66

ā€“

Malerba, 2013 [14]

Glioma

Per 1 cup

44 (0, 81)

0.15

0.961

0

0.83

ā€“

Kennedy, 2017 [10]

Liver cancer

Per 1 cup

59 (30, 76)

0.001

0.00005093

13

7.22

0.005

Tang, 2010 [19]

Lung cancer

Per 1 cup

41 (0, 73)

0.092

0.499

3

2.21

0.543

Turati, 2012 [21]

Pancreatic cancer

Per 1 cup

65 (47, 76)

<ā€‰0.001

0.326

4

8.67

ā€“

Gan, 2017 [3]

Rectal cancer

Per 1 cup

12 (0, 50)

0.323

0.383

0

3.15

ā€“

  1. Abbreviation: H/L The highest intake vs. lowest intake of coffee
  2. Reference was provided in Additional file 1: TableĀ S3
  3. * P value from Cochranā€™s Q test for heterogeneity.
  4. a Observed and expected number of significant studies using effect of largest study (smallest standard error) of each meta-analysis as plausible effect size
  5. b P value from test for excess significance bias. All statistical tests are two sided