Skip to main content

Table 2 Hazard ratios and 95% confidence interval (CI) for risk of PLC among participants stratified by hs-CRP subgroups in different regression models

From: A prospective follow-up study of the relationship between high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and primary liver cancer

 

hs-CRP

< 1 mg/L

1–3 mg/L

> 3 mg/L

P for trend

Multivariate COX Regression

 Cases

183

89

85

 

 Person-years

573,524

264,335

197,180

 

 Model 1

1.00(Ref.)

1.08 (0.84 ~ 1.40)

1.38 (1.06 ~ 1.81)

0.0616

 Model 2

1.00(Ref.)

1.09 (0.84 ~ 1.41)

1.41 (1.08 ~ 1.85)

0.0428

 Model 3

1.00(Ref.)

1.07 (0.82 ~ 1.38)

1.51 (1.15 ~ 1.98)

0.0121

CS Model

 Cases

183

89

85

 

 Person-years

573,524

264,335

197,180

 

 Model 1

1.00(Ref.)

1.08 (0.84 ~ 1.40)

1.38 (1.06 ~ 1.81)

0.0616

 Model 2

1.00(Ref.)

1.08 (0.84 ~ 1.41)

1.41 (1.08 ~ 1.85)

0.0428

 Model 3

1.00(Ref.)

1.06 (0.81 ~ 1.40)

1.50 (1.14 ~ 1.99)

0.0133

SD Model

 Cases

183

89

85

 

 Person-years

573,524

264,335

197,180

 

 Model 1

1.00(Ref.)

1.07 (0.83 ~ 1.39)

1.36 (1.04 ~ 1.79)

0.0780

 Model 2

1.00(Ref.)

1.08 (0.84 ~ 1.40)

1.39 (1.06 ~ 1.82)

0.0554

 Model 3

1.00(Ref.)

1.05 (0.80 ~ 1.40)

1.49 (1.13 ~ 1.98)

0.0151

  1. Model 1: Univariate analysis
  2. Model 2: Adjusted for age, sex based on model 1
  3. Model 3: Further adjusted for BMI, ALT, cirrhosis, hepatitis B virus infection, NAFLD, adiabetes mellitus, family history of cancer, smoking status, drinking status, physical activity based on model 2
  4. CS model: In cause-specific hazard model; SD: sub-distribution hazard function model