Skip to main content

Table 3 Lifecourse multiple regression analyses of SEP with the risk of BC in E3N using imputed data (N = 83,436)

From: The impact of lifecourse socio-economic position and individual social mobility on breast cancer risk

   

E3N

Model A

Model B

Model C

Model D

Covariates

Reference

Modality

HR [95%CI]

HR [95%CI]

HR [95%CI]

HR [95%CI]

Father’s occupation

Disadvantaged

Medium

1.00 [0.95; 1.06]

0.98 [0.93; 1.04]

0.98 [0.93; 1.04]

0.98 [0.93; 1.04]

  

Advantaged

1.10 [1.02; 1.18]

1.06 [0.98; 1.14]

1.05 [0.98; 1.13]

1.03 [0.96; 1.11]

Education

Low

Middle

–

1.09 [1.01; 1.17]

1.12 [1.02; 1.22]

1.04 [0.95; 1.14]

  

High

–

1.19 [1.11; 1.29]

1.23 [1.12; 1.35]

1.06 [0.97; 1.17]

Occupation

Disadvantaged

Medium

–

–

0.95 [0.88; 1.02]

0.97 [0.90; 1.04]

  

Advantaged

–

–

1.00 [0.91; 1.09]

1.03 [0.94; 1.13]

  1. Model A is adjusted for age and father’s occupation
  2. Model B is adjusted for age, father’s occupation and education
  3. Model C is adjusted for age and both SEP
  4. Model D is adjusted for age, both SEP and all covariates (i.e. alcohol consumption, smoking status, physical activity, Western diet pattern, height, weight, family history of ovarian cancer or BC, MHT use, breastfeeding, cancer screening, reproductive lifespan, age at first childbirth and menopausal status)
Back to article page

BMC Cancer

ISSN: 1471-2407

Contact us