Skip to main content

Table 2 Cox Proportional Hazards Regression Analyses of overall survival for ENB patients in the training Cohort

From: A novel nomogram to predict the overall survival in esthesinoeroblastoma

Variable Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
HR (95%) P HR (95%) P
Sex (%) Ref    
 Female 1.392 (0.826–2.344) 0.214 NI  
 Male    NI  
Age(%)
 < =54 Ref   Ref  
 55–69 1.787 (1.002–3.186) 0.049 1.726 (0.962–3.097) 0.067
 > =70 4.131 (2.160–7.900) < 0.001 3.773 (1.950–7.505) < 0.001
Tumor Grade(%)
 Low Ref   Ref  
 High 2.240 (1.354–3.707) < 0.001 1.991 (1.151–3.444) 0.014
Modified Kadish
 A or B Ref   Ref  
 C 2.536 (1.187–5.42) 0.016 1.950 (0.892–4.263) 0.094
 D 5.246 (2.199–12.51) < 0.001 2.797 (1.057–7.401) 0.038
Chemotherapy
 N Ref   Ref  
 Y 1.857 (1.126–3.061) 0.015 1.161 (0.635–2.122) 0.628
Radiotherapy
 N Ref   NI  
 Y 0.725 (0.435–1.209) 0.218 NI  
Surgery
 N Ref   Ref  
 Y 0.407(0.217–0.764) 0.005 0.729 (0.362–1.470) 0.378
  1. N No/Unknown, Y Yes, NI Not include, Ref Reference, HR Hazard Ratio