Skip to main content

Table 1 Basic features of the publications included in this meta-analysis (n = 20)

From: High BANCR expression is associated with worse prognosis in human malignant carcinomas: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

   

cancer type

No. of patients

BANCR expression

detection method

survival analysis

 

HR statistics

hazard ratios (95% CI)

follow-up (month)

Study (Reference)

year

country

high

low

cut-off

   

total

LNM

HTS

DM

total

LNM

HTS

DM

 

Guo Q [34]

2014

China

CRC

60

18

14

16

–

42

13

16

–

qRT-PCR

OS

mean-value

NA

NA

NA

He A [30]

2016

China

Bladder cancer

54

19

1

9

–

35

3

30

–

qRT-PCR

OS

NA

NA

NA

NA

Liu T [27]

2018

China

PTC

30

17

4

–

–

13

6

–

–

qRT-PCR

OS

mean-value

directly

NA

60

Li L [12]

2015

China

GC

184

92

60

67

12

92

43

51

0

qRT-PCR

OS

median

directly

1.511(1.025–2.227)

100

Liao T [24]

2017

China

PTC

92

29

14

4

–

63

30

22

–

qRT-PCR

–

NA

NA

NA

NA

Liu Z [35]

2016

China

ESCC

142

71

57

41

30

71

33

23

19

qRT-PCR

OS

median

directly

2.24(1.05–4.76)

60

DFS

median

directly

3.45(1.92–6.20)

Lou K [33]

2018

China

BC

65

34

24

18

–

31

13

6

–

qRT-PCR

OS

NA

SC

1.39(0.86–2.25)

120

DFS

1.48(0.83–2.64)

Shen X [29]

2017

China

CRC

116

53

32

–

–

53

17

–

–

qRT-PCR

OS

median

directly

2.24(1.22–4.11)

70

Sun M [19]

2014

China

NSCLC

113

53

19

11

–

60

40

30

–

qRT-PCR

OS

fold change

SC

0.5(0.26–0.94)

40

DFS

0.34(0.18–0.64)

Wang D [36]

2016

China

EC

30

15

6

7

–

15

1

1

–

qRT-PCR

OS

median

NA

NA

NA

Wang H [37]

2016

China

HCC

108

43

29

35

–

65

23

20

–

qRT-PCR

OS

mean-value

NA

NA

NA

Jiang J [32]

2018

China

BC

216

125

63

60

 

91

17

18

 

qRT-PCR

OS

median

NA

1.585(1.298–1.935)

60

RFS

1.532(1.272–1.844)

Zhang J [26]

2018

China

PTC

60

17

6

–

–

43

30

–

–

qRT-PCR

OS

NA

NA

NA

NA

Sadeghpour [22]

2018

Iran

ESCC

150

75

–

38

41

75

–

17

10

qRT-PCR

OS

NA

NA

NA

NA

Peng Z [23]

2015

China

Osteosarcoma

84

42

–

30

20

42

–

16

14

qRT-PCR

OS

median

directly

2.934(1.12–7.67)

60

Zhao N [16]

2018

China

HCC

46

23

–

7

–

23

–

4

–

qRT-PCR

OS

mean-value

NA

NA

NA

Zhou T [17]

2016

China

HCC

109

54

–

37

–

55

–

21

–

qRT-PCR

OS

median

SC

4.24(1.32–13.61)

60

Su S [38]

2015

China

retinoblastoma

60

30

–

–

–

30

–

–

–

qRT-PCR

OS

median

directly

2.9(1.05–8.03)

60

Xue S [18]

2018

China

ccRCC

62

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

qRT-PCR

OS

NA

SC

0.77(0.24–2.47)

60

Chen Q [39]

2018

China

ESCC

80

39

30

–

–

41

16

–

–

qRT-PCR

NA

median

NA

–

NA

  1. Note. BRAF-activated noncoding RNA; No. Number; Total: total patients in high expression group or low expression group; NSCLC Non-small cell lung cancer; HCC Hepatocellular carcinoma; CRC Colorectal cancer; BL Bladder cancer; BC Breast cancer; ccRCC Clear cell renal cell carcinoma; GC Gastric cancer; LNM Lymphatic node metastasis; DM Distant metastasis; HTS High tumor stage (III,IV); NA Not available; qRT-PCR Quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction; ESCC Esophagus cancer; EC Endometrial Cancer; SC Survival curve; directly: HR was extracted dirrectly from article; PTC Thyroid Carcinoma; OS Overall survival; DFS Disease free survival; RFS Recurrence free survival