Skip to main content

Table 6 Comparison of the 2 surgical methods between different age after PSM

From: Short-term outcomes of robotic- versus laparoscopic-assisted Total Gastrectomy for advanced gastric Cancer: a propensity score matching study

 

Age ≥ 65ys

Age < 65ys

RATG(n = 47)

LATG(n = 44)

p

RATG(n = 79)

LATG(n = 82)

p

Sex (male/female)

42/5

37/7

0.458

63/16

63/19

0.654

BMI (kg/m2)

22.54 ± 2.69

21.69 ± 2.68

0.137

21.83 ± 2.32

22.36 ± 2.90

0.214

Tumor location (non-EGJ/EGJ)

20/27

22/22

0.476

48/31

43/39

0.287

Tumor size (cm)

4.39 ± 2.05

4.48 ± 2.70

0.868

4.76 ± 2.31

4.36 ± 2.16

0.263

TNM (IB/IIA/IIB/IIIA/IIIB/IIIC)

2/3/4/17/11/10

4/1/6/15/11/7

0.503

1/3/20/35/10/10

4/0/16/35/17/10

0.340

Comorbidities (present/absent)

14/33

18/26

0.267

21/58

17/65

0.382

Operation time (min)

291.70 ± 71.98

259.98 ± 49.99

0.017

290.81 ± 50.55

275.90 ± 52.83

0.069

Estimated blood loss (ml)

161.81 ± 94.15

174.20 ± 90.68

0.524

149.94 ± 87.23

188.90 ± 97.98

0.037

No. of N2 tier

9.19 ± 6.45

7.41 ± 4.18

0.124

9.00 ± 4.61

7.63 ± 4.69

0.012

No. of Retrieved lymph nodes

34.79 ± 13.33

33.02 ± 12.29

0.514

34.96 ± 12.96

31.32 ± 12.59

0.072

R0/R1

42/5

39/5

1.000

72/5

79/3

0.650

Proximal margin (cm)

3.22 ± 1.57

3.61 ± 1.44

0.221

3.74 ± 1.74

3.70 ± 1.59

0.870

Postoperative complication (%)

14 (29.8)

14 (31.8)

0.834

16 (20.3)

22 (26.8)

0.326

Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ IIIa (%)

3 (6.4)

1 (2.3)

0.657

4 (5.1)

6 (7.3)

0.554

Postoperative hospital stay (d)

9.79 ± 2.81

10.34 ± 4.98

0.512

9.52 ± 2.92

9.60 ± 3.92

0.885

  1. RATG Robotic-assisted total gastrectomy, LATG Laparoscopic-assisted total gastrectomy, BMI body mass index, TNM tumor-node-metastasis, EGJ esophagogastric junction, R Residual disease(R classification)