Skip to main content

Table 4 Comparison of the 2 surgical methods between different tumor location after PSM

From: Short-term outcomes of robotic- versus laparoscopic-assisted Total Gastrectomy for advanced gastric Cancer: a propensity score matching study

 

Location EGJ

Location non-EGJ

RATG(n = 58)

LATG(n = 61)

p

RATG(n = 68)

LATG(n = 65)

p

Age

61.64 ± 8.57

62.41 ± 7.80

0.608

59.21 ± 9.16

59.25 ± 9.89

0.981

Sex (male/female)

50/8

51/10

0.692

55/13

49/16

0.443

BMI (kg/m2)

22.90 ± 2.38

22.45 ± 2.82

0.344

21.41 ± 2.37

21.82 ± 2.84

0.359

Tumor size (cm)

3.66 ± 1.53

4.10 ± 1.51

0.121

5.44 ± 2.39

4.69 ± 2.91

0.106

TNM (IB/IIA/IIB/IIIA/IIIB/IIIC)

2/1/12/27/11/5

1/1/10/29/12/8

0.350

1/5/12/25/10/15

7/0/12/21/16/9

0.611

Comorbidities (present/absent)

18/40

11/50

0.099

17/51

24/41

0.137

Operation time (min)

287.98 ± 51.97

273.07 ± 49.62

0.113

293.84 ± 64.95

267.78 ± 54.80

0.014

Estimated blood loss (ml)

134.66 ± 58.83

173.93 ± 89.41

0.011

171.18 ± 106.95

193.00 ± 100.49

0.085

No. of N2 tier

8.79 ± 4.86

7.43 ± 3.84

0.091

9.31 ± 5.75

7.68 ± 5.07

0.085

No. of Retrieved lymph nodes

35.43 ± 13.38

33.36 ± 11.68

0.184

34.44 ± 12.84

31.49 ± 13.23

0.194

R0/R1

52/6

56/5

0.686

64/4

62/3

1.000

Proximal margin (cm)

2.12 ± 0.99

2.58 ± 1.08

0.013

4.77 ± 1.11

4.69 ± 1.14

0.682

Postoperative complication (%)

18 (31.0)

15 (24.6)

0.433

12 (17.6)

17 (26.2)

0.235

Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ IIIa (%)

5 (8.6)

1 (1.6)

0.187

2 (2.9)

6 (9.2)

0.246

Postoperative hospital stay (d)

9.90 ± 2.77

9.31 ± 1.85

0.176

9.38 ± 2.93

10.37 ± 5.71

0.914

  1. RATG Robotic-assisted total gastrectomy, LATG Laparoscopic-assisted total gastrectomy, BMI body mass index, TNM tumor-node-metastasis, EGJ esophagogastric junction, R Residual disease(R classification)