Skip to main content

Table 2 Univariable analysis of clinical variables with Cox proportional hazard model for DMFS and OS

From: Prognostic value of lymph node to primary tumor standardized uptake value ratio in unresectable esophageal cancer

Variables

DMFS

OS

HR (95% CI)

P value

HR (95% CI)

P value

Gender (vs. Male)

 Female

1.70 (0.77–3.71)

0.187

1.63 (0.75–3.55)

0.221

Age (year)

0.99 (0.96–1.02)

0.616

1.00 (0.97–1.03)

0.947

Previous cancer history (vs. No)

 Yes

0.59 (0.14–2.40)

0.456

0.53 (0.13–2.18)

0.383

Performance status (vs. ECOG 0–1)

 ECOG 2–3

1.54 (0.37–6.32)

0.552

2.43 (0.76–7.79)

0.135

Differentiation (vs. Well to moderate)

 Poorly differentiated

0.85 (0.47–1.51)

0.575

0.78 (0.45–1.36)

0.381

Tumor length (cm)

1.05 (0.94–1.16)

0.400

1.05 (0.95–1.16)

0.370

Tumor location (vs. Cervical-upper)

 Middle to lower third

0.71 (0.44–1.14)

0.158

0.82 (0.52–1.27)

0.366

Nodal stage (vs. N0-N1)

 N2

1.05 (0.52–2.12)

0.900

1.43 (0.72–2.86)

0.311

 N3

1.86 (0.90–3.84)

0.090*

2.06 (0.99–4.28)

0.052*

First course RT dose (vs. > = 40 Gy)

  < 40 Gy

1.72 (1.08–2.75)

0.024**

1.47 (0.94–2.28)

0.091*

Chemotherapy regimen (vs. Taxanes-based regimens)

 Cisplatin + 5-FU

2.30 (1.27–4.17)

0.006**

1.67 (0.99–2.81)

0.053*

SUVTumor

1.00 (0.97–1.04)

0.984

1.00 (0.96–1.03)

0.848

SUVLN

1.03 (1.00–1.07)

0.026**

1.03 (1.00–1.06)

0.053*

NTR (vs. Low NTR [<= 0.46])

 High NTR (>  0.46)

2.17 (1.33–3.53)

0.002**

1.77 (1.12–2.79)

0.014**

  1. DMFS distant metastasis-free survival, OS overall survival, HR hazard ratio
  2. * p value < 0.1 (marginal significance)
  3. **p value < 0.05 (statistical significance)