Skip to main content

Table 3 Performance of formulae

From: A novel nomogram to predict the reliability of estimated glomerular filtration rate formulae in oncology patients

Equations

MPE

MAPE

P30

P10

CCC

TDI

CP

Cockcroft-Gault

17.8 (14.7, 20.8)cdef

27.8 (25.5, 30.1)cef

62.8 (58.3, 67.3)cef

24.8 (20.8, 28.8)cf

0.60 (0.56)

39 (41)

34 (32)

MDRD

19.2 (16.2, 22.0)cef

27.8 (25.5,29.9)cef

63.0 (58.6, 67.6)cef

24.3 (20.3, 28.3)cf

0.61 (0.57)

36 (38)

35 (33)

C-MDRD

32.3 (29.0, 35.6)abdef

37.5 (34.7, 40.3)abdf

49.7 (45.0, 54.3)abdef

17.0 (13.6, 20.6)abf

0.49 (0.46)

49 (51)

24 (23)

CKD-EPI

22.9 (20.0, 25.7)acef

29.2 (26.9, 31.4)cef

60.6 (56.0, 65.1)cef

21.6 (17.8, 25.5)f

0.60 (0.57)

36 (37)

33 (31)

Wright

30.7 (27.6, 33.6)abcdf

34.5 (27.6, 33.6)abdf

51.9 (47.4, 56.7)abcdf

20.2 (16.5, 24.0)f

0.53 (0.50)

44 (45)

26 (25)

FAS

44.0 (40.6, 47.4)abcde

45.9 (42.7, 49.1)abcde

38.0 (33.5, 42.4)abcde

11.7 (8.7, 14.6)abcde

0.42 (0.38)

55 (56)

17 (16)

  1. Data are presented with 95% CIs. MPE mean percentage error, MAPE mean absolute percentage error; P30 and P10, percentage of patients within 30 and 10% that estimated from the measured glomerular filtration rate. CCC concordance correlation coefficient, TDI total deviation index, CP coverage probability, MDRD modification of diet in renal disease, C-MDRD modified MDRD Study equation for Chinese, CKD-EPI chronic kidney disease epidemiology collaboration, FAS full age spectrum. ap < 0.05 compared with CG equation; bp < 0.05 compared with MDRD equation; cp < 0.05 compared with C-MDRD equation; dp < 0.05 compared with CKD-EPI equation; ep < 0.05 compared with Wright equation; fp < 0.05 compared with FAS equation